201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668120)
21. Spurious 99% bootstrap and jackknife support for unsupported clades.
Simmons MP; Freudenstein JV
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):177-91. PubMed ID: 21703355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
Bansal MS; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 5():18. PubMed ID: 20181274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Split-based computation of majority-rule supertrees.
Kupczok A
BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 11():205. PubMed ID: 21752249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.
Scornavacca C; Berry V; Lefort V; Douzery EJ; Ranwez V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():413. PubMed ID: 18834542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.
Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D; Burleigh JG
Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():347-56. PubMed ID: 19455229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.
Ranwez V; Berry V; Criscuolo A; Fabre PH; Guillemot S; Scornavacca C; Douzery EJ
Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 17918032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
Yang Z; Rannala B
Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):455-70. PubMed ID: 16012111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors influencing phylogenetic inference: a case study using the mammalian carnivores.
Bininda-Emonds OR
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Jul; 16(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 10877944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Conditioned genome reconstruction: how to avoid choosing the conditioning genome.
Spencer M; Bryant D; Susko E
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 17366135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fast local search for unrooted Robinson-Foulds supertrees.
Chaudhary R; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):1004-13. PubMed ID: 22431553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Homoplasy and clade support.
Brandley MC; Warren DL; Leaché AD; McGuire JA
Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 20525577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increasing data transparency and estimating phylogenetic uncertainty in supertrees: Approaches using nonparametric bootstrapping.
Moore BR; Smith SA; Donoghue MJ
Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 16969942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inconsistencies in arguments for the supertree approach: supermatrices versus supertrees of Crocodylia.
Gatesy J; Baker RH; Hayashi C
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):342-55. PubMed ID: 15205058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades.
Wiens JJ; Fetzner JW; Parkinson CL; Reeder TW
Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):778-807. PubMed ID: 16243760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.
Avni E; Yona Z; Cohen R; Snir S
J Mol Evol; 2018 Feb; 86(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 29460038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.
Swenson MS; Barbançon F; Warnow T; Linder CR
Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 20047664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Constructing rooted supertrees using distances.
Willson SJ
Bull Math Biol; 2004 Nov; 66(6):1755-83. PubMed ID: 15522354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. BCD Beam Search: considering suboptimal partial solutions in Bad Clade Deletion supertrees.
Fleischauer M; Böcker S
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4987. PubMed ID: 29900080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals.
Liu FG; Miyamoto MM; Freire NP; Ong PQ; Tennant MR; Young TS; Gugel KF
Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1786-9. PubMed ID: 11230694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
