These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668755)

  • 1. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth.
    Al-harbi F; Nathanson D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 14668755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems.
    Goto Y; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Junge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the retention of three endodontic dowel systems following different surface treatments.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Kelsey MR
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 18086142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems.
    Usumez A; Cobankara FK; Ozturk N; Eskitascioglu G; Belli S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 15295326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11935506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro study evaluating the effect of ferrule length on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced and zirconia dowel systems.
    Akkayan B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 15295325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of prefabricated titanium dowels cemented with three luting resins.
    Yang B; Wolfart S; Li Q; Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Dec; 12(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 20157652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of cast metal dowel retention using various luting agents and tensile loading.
    Ertugrul HZ; Ismail YH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 15867754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts.
    Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.
    Aksoy G; Cotert HS; Korkut L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 15867753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is a "flexible" glass fiber-bundle dowel system as retentive as a "rigid" quartz fiber dowel system?
    Al-Tayyan MH; Watts DC; Kurer HG; Qualtrough AJ
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 18761571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fatigue and failure analysis of restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors without a dowel or ferrule.
    de Carvalho MA; Lazari-Carvalho PC; Del Bel Cury AA; Magne P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):241-250. PubMed ID: 35705432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.