These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668762)

  • 1. Use of casting tape for support of an extraoral impression.
    Siadat H; Mirfazaelian A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Dec; 90(6):598-9. PubMed ID: 14668762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Compatibility between impressions of irreversible hydrocolloid and plaster for working models].
    Bracco P; Bruna E
    Riv Ital Odontotec; 1983; 19(4):20-30. PubMed ID: 6382435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A boxing technique for irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Machnee CH; Loney RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):610-2. PubMed ID: 2691666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear distortion and compatibility of an antimicrobial irreversible hydrocolloid impression material and improved dental stones.
    Sevedge SR; Gunderson RB; Singer MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 2691667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A two-stage impression technique for custom facial prostheses.
    Coleman AJ; Schweiger JW; Urquiola J; Tompkins KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):370-2. PubMed ID: 7783016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Synthetic casting tape as a facial impression tray material.
    Saunders TR; Hansen NA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Aug; 74(2):169-70. PubMed ID: 8537924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for making casts from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Steas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):454-6. PubMed ID: 2056470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro study of transmission of bacteria from contaminated metal models to stone models via impressions.
    Sofou A; Larsen T; Owall B; Fiehn NE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Sep; 6(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 12271350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial moulage: the effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Lemon JC; Okay DJ; Powers JM; Martin JW; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 12942062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of dental stone casts from alginate impressions.
    Keuter FM; Davidson CL
    J Dent; 1986 Feb; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 3546427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products. Part II. A refined discriminatory procedure.
    Owen CP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Mar; 13(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 3514824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS.
    PEYTON FA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified technique for boxing irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Kotwal KR; Villalobos EG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jun; 59(6):741-2. PubMed ID: 3042966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Materials for casting of impressions. Hardness tests].
    Tassarotti B; Nesler P; Maj F
    Riv Ital Odontotec; 1983; 19(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 6591287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A universal boxing procedure: irreversible hydrocolloid and magnetic strip.
    NaBadalung DP; Connelly ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 9710834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.