BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14668833)

  • 1. QUAD system offers fair shares to all authors.
    Verhagen JV; Wallace KJ; Collins SC; Scott TR
    Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6967):602. PubMed ID: 14668833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen.
    Michell B
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The garbage collectors: could a particular sector of author-pays journals become silently acknowledged collectors of scientific waste?
    Moore A
    Bioessays; 2009 Aug; 31(8):821. PubMed ID: 19609967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.
    Editors of the Publications Division, Ameican Chemical Society
    Biomacromolecules; 2001; 2(1):19A-21A. PubMed ID: 12442743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
    Dahlqvist R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
    Brookfield J
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
    Bergström R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
    Colquhoun D
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innovation, journal reviewers, and journal editors the game is worth the candle.
    Popp RL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(7):1360-1. PubMed ID: 16198856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
    Beall J
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CONSORT and beyond.
    Blackstone EH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 16872939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publication and citation ethics.
    Srinivasan S; Thomas G; Pai SA
    Natl Med J India; 2006; 19(2):113; author reply 113; discussion 113-4. PubMed ID: 16756208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.