These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1467010)

  • 41. Change in pH during setting of polyelectrolyte dental cements.
    Wasson EA; Nicholson JW
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 8473593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns--an in vitro study.
    Reddy R; Basappa N; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Mar; 16(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 11813717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An investigation of pH changes of various cements.
    Duymuş ZY
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):753-7. PubMed ID: 15470999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Study on dental cements. 1. The cored structure of three luting cements obtained by using Cryo-SEM and image analyzer].
    Hosoda H; Yamada T; Nakajima M; Perinka L
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 2135511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of post-core and crown material and luting agents on stress distribution in tooth restorations.
    Oyar P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 24560984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dental cements: an update.
    Jones DW
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 64(8):569-70. PubMed ID: 9785686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vitro erosion of 20 commercial glass ionomer cements measured using the lactic acid jet test.
    Billington RW; Williams JA; Pearson GJ
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(8):543-7. PubMed ID: 1633228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The extent of luting agent remnants on titanium and zirconia abutment analogs after scaling.
    Behr M; Spitzer A; Preis V; Weng D; Gosau M; Rosentritt M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25216147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Antibacterial properties of aged dental cements evaluated by direct-contact and agar diffusion tests.
    Lewinstein I; Matalon S; Slutzkey S; Weiss EI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 15798687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):482-7. PubMed ID: 11203860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In vivo disintegration of luting cements.
    Phillips RW; Swartz ML; Lund MS; Moore BK; Vickery J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Apr; 114(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 3470375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Thermal diffusivity of glass-ionomer cements.
    Tay WM; Braden M
    J Dent Res; 1987 May; 66(5):1040-3. PubMed ID: 3475320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Current dental materials. Part 2: Cements.
    Feldman BN
    Ont Dent; 1983 Mar; 60(3):39, 41. PubMed ID: 6587281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements.
    Gemalmaz D; Yoruc B; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 9791796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Antibacterial properties of current orthodontic band cements.
    Vokus RP; Cisneros GJ; Levi M
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 9524972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH; Hazelton LR; Bales DJ; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Glass ionomers for direct bonding: an in vitro assessment.
    Tavas MA; Salem NS
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Aug; 17(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 2207053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.