BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14670175)

  • 1. Ultrasound-guided optical tomographic imaging of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical results of 19 cases.
    Zhu Q; Huang M; Chen N; Zarfos K; Jagjivan B; Kane M; Hedge P; Kurtzman SH
    Neoplasia; 2003; 5(5):379-88. PubMed ID: 14670175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI-guided diffuse optical spectroscopy of malignant and benign breast lesions.
    Ntziachristos V; Yodh AG; Schnall MD; Chance B
    Neoplasia; 2002; 4(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 12082551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Small focal lesions of the breast: a clinico-morphological analysis].
    Serov VV; Kuzin MI; Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Arkh Patol; 1984; 46(9):25-32. PubMed ID: 6095796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction.
    Zhu Q; Cronin EB; Currier AA; Vine HS; Huang M; Chen N; Xu C
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 16183924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Wang XY; Kang LK; Lan CY
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 25118483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [X-ray morphologic characteristics of microcalcination in benign processes and cancer of the breast].
    Zolotarevskiĭ VB; Zal'tsman IN; Kulakova AM
    Vopr Onkol; 1989; 35(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 2546321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
    Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benign and malignant breast disease: magnetic resonance and radiofrequency pulse sequences.
    el Yousef SJ; O'Connell DM; Duchesneau RH; Smith MJ; Hubay CA; Guyton SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2988320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
    Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Value of BI-RADS ultrasonic scores of direct and indirect ultrasonographic signs in diagnosis of solid breast lesions].
    Gao JX; Yu XQ; Yao LH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 33(6):465-9. PubMed ID: 21875490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of duplex Doppler ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Britton PD; Coulden RA
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Dec; 42(6):399-401. PubMed ID: 2175686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens.
    Edmonds PD; Mortensen CL; Hill JR; Holland SK; Jensen JF; Schattner P; Valdes AD
    Ultrason Imaging; 1991 Apr; 13(2):162-85. PubMed ID: 1650048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
    Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
    Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
    Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Case Series of Malign Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
    Yilmaz TF; Sari L; Temur HO; Toprak H; Yildiz Ş
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 32723248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Breast echography].
    Brombart JC
    J Belge Radiol; 1995 Feb; 78(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 7890592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical imaging as an adjunct to sonograph in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.
    Zhu Q; Conant E; Chance B
    J Biomed Opt; 2000 Apr; 5(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 10938788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.