These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14671580)
21. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing. Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Otosclerosis: mid-term results of cochlear implantation. Sainz M; García-Valdecasas J; Garófano M; Ballesteros JM Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 17675831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children. Wu JL; Lin CY; Yang HM; Lin YH Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 70(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 16043234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure. Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Objective methods of fitting speech processors of cochlear implants Combi-40/40+ and Tempo+: impedance technique]. Petrov SM; Shchukina AA Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2007; (5):20-2. PubMed ID: 18163073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Wong AO; Wong LL Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun; 130(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 15195063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma. Lustig LR; Yeagle J; Driscoll CL; Blevins N; Francis H; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation. Vincenti V; Pasanisi E; Guida M; Di Trapani G; Sanna M Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique. Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users. Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Papsin BC Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Initial information on adjustment of speech processor of the cochlear implant]. Petrov SM Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2002; (4):18-20. PubMed ID: 12400125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Lejeune B; Demanez L B-ENT; 2006; 2(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16910289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Harrison RV; Gordon KA; Mount RJ Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Apr; 46(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 15772969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects. Wei CG; Cao K; Zeng FG Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 15504607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Analysis of factors effecting satisfaction of cochlear implants in prelingually deafened adolescents]. Liu S; Han DM; Zhao XT; Deng ZF; Wu X; Kong Y; Chen XQ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 85(10):693-6. PubMed ID: 15932735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]