These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects. Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A dynamic model of loudness adaptation]. Hübner R Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 2568038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone. Nieder B; Buus S; Cazals Y; Scharf B J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 17614461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four triggering factors in loudness adaptation. Weiler EM; Gold LS; Sandman DE; Warm JS J Gen Psychol; 1992 Oct; 119(4):325-34. PubMed ID: 1491237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for frequency-dependent and frequency-independent components in increasing- and decreasing-loudness aftereffects. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jan; 122(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 7714505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of expectations on loudness and loudness difference. Parker S; Moore JM; Bahraini S; Gunthert K; Zellner DA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1334-42. PubMed ID: 22669793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects. Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An introduction to induced loudness reduction. Epstein M J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL74. PubMed ID: 17927311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry]. Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cognitive influence on the loudness of tones that change continuously in level. Schlauch RS J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):758-65. PubMed ID: 1506529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Loudness adaptation, when induced, is real. Canévet G; Scharf B; Botte MC Br J Audiol; 1983 Feb; 17(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 6860822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Loudness adaptation: resolution of a psychophysical enigma. Dange A; Warm JS; Weiler EM; Dember WN J Gen Psychol; 1993 Jul; 120(3):217-43. PubMed ID: 8138793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The stimulus range effect: evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition. Parker S; Schneider B Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8084726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loudness of brief tones measured by magnitude estimation and loudness matching. Epstein M; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1943-5. PubMed ID: 16642806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The illusion of increasing loudness in brief steady tones: variation with carrier frequency. Reinhardt-Rutland AH J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 9042742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]