BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14672156)

  • 1. Early modulation of visual perception by emotional arousal: evidence from steady-state visual evoked brain potentials.
    Keil A; Gruber T; Müller MM; Moratti S; Stolarova M; Bradley MM; Lang PJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2003 Sep; 3(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 14672156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tagging cortical networks in emotion: a topographical analysis.
    Keil A; Costa V; Smith JC; Sabatinelli D; McGinnis EM; Bradley MM; Lang PJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Dec; 33(12):2920-31. PubMed ID: 21954087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing of emotional words measured simultaneously with steady-state visually evoked potentials and near-infrared diffusing-wave spectroscopy.
    Koban L; Ninck M; Li J; Gisler T; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 11():85. PubMed ID: 20663220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Affective picture modulation: valence, arousal, attention allocation and motivational significance.
    Leite J; Carvalho S; Galdo-Alvarez S; Alves J; Sampaio A; Gonçalves OF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):375-81. PubMed ID: 22226675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials.
    Hajcak G; MacNamara A; Foti D; Ferri J; Keil A
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affective prime and target picture processing: an ERP analysis of early and late interference effects.
    Flaisch T; Stockburger J; Schupp HT
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun; 20(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 18335309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady-state visually evoked potential topography during processing of emotional valence in healthy subjects.
    Kemp AH; Gray MA; Eide P; Silberstein RB; Nathan PJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Dec; 17(4):1684-92. PubMed ID: 12498742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-entrant projections modulate visual cortex in affective perception: evidence from Granger causality analysis.
    Keil A; Sabatinelli D; Ding M; Lang PJ; Ihssen N; Heim S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Feb; 30(2):532-40. PubMed ID: 18095279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of emotional arousal in the cerebral hemispheres: a study of oscillatory brain activity and event-related potentials.
    Keil A; Müller MM; Gruber T; Wienbruch C; Stolarova M; Elbert T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 112(11):2057-68. PubMed ID: 11682344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural Mechanism of Affective Perception: Evidence from Phase and Causality Analysis in the Cerebral Cortex.
    Zhuang N; Jiang L; Yan B; Tong L; Shu J; Yang K; Yao D; Xu P; Zeng Y
    Neuroscience; 2021 May; 461():44-56. PubMed ID: 33607228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli.
    Kemp AH; Silberstein RB; Armstrong SM; Nathan PJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):632-46. PubMed ID: 14980566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural signature of extracting emotional content from rapid visual streams at multiple presentation rates: A cross-laboratory study.
    Bekhtereva V; Pritschmann R; Keil A; Müller MM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Dec; 55(12):e13222. PubMed ID: 30112759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time course of affective bias in visual attention: convergent evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials and behavioral data.
    Hindi Attar C; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Dec; 53(4):1326-33. PubMed ID: 20615472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competition for attentional resources between low spatial frequency content of emotional images and a foreground task in early visual cortex.
    Müller MM; Gundlach C
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):429-443. PubMed ID: 27990660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directed attention reduces processing of emotional distracters irrespective of valence and arousal level.
    Wiens S; Syrjänen E
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 23669534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extent and time-course of competition in visual cortex between emotionally arousing distractors and a concurrent task.
    Deweese MM; Müller M; Keil A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 43(7):961-70. PubMed ID: 26790572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of competition for visual processing resources between emotional pictures and foreground task.
    Müller MM; Andersen SK; Keil A
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1892-9. PubMed ID: 18063562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brain potentials during affective picture processing in children.
    Hajcak G; Dennis TA
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 19103249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Augmentation of serotonin enhances pleasant and suppresses unpleasant cortical electrophysiological responses to visual emotional stimuli in humans.
    Kemp AH; Gray MA; Silberstein RB; Armstrong SM; Nathan PJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1084-96. PubMed ID: 15219580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.