These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses. Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Harrison DE; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DD Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Mar; 21(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16378668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to posteroanterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain. Colloca CJ; Keller TS J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):489-500. PubMed ID: 11677547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study. Nathan M; Keller TS J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Sep; 17(7):431-41. PubMed ID: 7989876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of disc degeneration on neurophysiological responses during dorsoventral mechanical excitation of the ovine lumbar spine. Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DE J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Oct; 18(5):829-37. PubMed ID: 17468010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine. Keller TS; Colloca CJ J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Oct; 25(8):485-96. PubMed ID: 12381970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a noninvasive dynamic spinal stiffness assessment methodology in an animal model of intervertebral disc degeneration. Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Moore RJ; Harrison DE; Gunzburg R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1900-5. PubMed ID: 19680098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo transient vibration assessment of the normal human thoracolumbar spine. Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Fuhr AW J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Oct; 23(8):521-30. PubMed ID: 11050608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effect of postural perturbation on motoneuronal activity following various methods of lumbar spinal manipulation. Dishman JD; Dougherty PE; Burke JR Spine J; 2005; 5(6):650-9. PubMed ID: 16291107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physiological responses to spinal manipulation therapy: investigation of the relationship between electromyographic responses and peak force. Nougarou F; Dugas C; Deslauriers C; Pagé I; Descarreaux M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013; 36(9):557-63. PubMed ID: 24161387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased multiaxial lumbar motion responses during multiple-impulse mechanical force manually assisted spinal manipulation. Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DE Chiropr Osteopat; 2006 Apr; 14():6. PubMed ID: 16597343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechancial quantification of pathologic manipulable spinal lesions: an in vivo ovine model of spondylolysis and intervertebral disc degeneration. Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R; Freeman BJ; Szpalski M; Afifi M; Moore RJ J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012 Jun; 35(5):354-66. PubMed ID: 22657392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of preload forces in spinal manipulation: experimental investigation of kinematic and electromyographic responses in healthy adults. Nougarou F; Dugas C; Loranger M; Pagé I; Descarreaux M J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Jun; 37(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24928637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]