These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14674510)

  • 1. Considerations in sterile filtration. Part II: the sterilizing filter and its organism challenge: a critique of regulatory standards.
    Jornitz MW; Akers JE; Agalloco JP; Madsen RE; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2003; 57(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 14674510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considerations in sterile filtration--Part I: The changed role of filter integrity testing.
    Jornitz MW; Agalloco JP; Akers JE; Madsen RE; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 11865783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of sterilizing grade filtration.
    Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2003; 113():65-9. PubMed ID: 14620854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Canadians contemplate new sterility definition.
    MPS; 1980 Jul; 11(7):1, 15, 17. PubMed ID: 10324770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preuse/Poststerilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT): To Do or Not to Do?
    Gupta VS; Jindal J; Gupta A; Gupta NK
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 31732690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An industry commentary on regulatory issues--microbiology.
    Moldenhauer JE
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 11977405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sterile filtration: process optimization through real compliance.
    Schroeder HG
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2003; 57(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 14765554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why and how to implement a rapid sterility test.
    Gressett G; Vanhaecke E; Moldenhauer J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(6):429-44. PubMed ID: 19634346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Risk-based Approach to Setting Sterile Filtration Bioburden Limits.
    Yang H; Li N; Chang S
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 24265301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Amendments to sterility test requirements for biological products. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2012 May; 77(86):26162-75. PubMed ID: 22606719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulatory aspects of isolation/barrier technology.
    Lyda JC
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 8581462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A means of refining the sterilization criterion].
    Motina GL; Kalinina NM; Eremina VA
    Antibiot Med Biotekhnol; 1987 Sep; 32(9):662-4. PubMed ID: 3324951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an improved sterility test.
    Moldenhauer J; Sutton SV
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2004; 58(6):284-6. PubMed ID: 15663059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid methods for testing the efficacy of sterilization-grade filter membranes.
    Griffiths MH; Andrew PW; Ball PR; Hall GM
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Aug; 66(8):3432-7. PubMed ID: 10919803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Development of a new testmethod for surface disinfection procedures. VII. Proposal for the method (author's transl)].
    Borneff J; Werner H-P
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B; 1977 Sep; 165(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 412356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sterile is a sterile word.
    Campbell RW
    Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Dec; 56(12):14-6. PubMed ID: 510824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of standard and diagnostic reference reagents and methods.
    McConnell S
    Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc; 1976; (80):50-5. PubMed ID: 802768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Steves M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):373-92. PubMed ID: 11766823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A validation survey of 197 hospital steam sterilizers in The Netherlands in 2001 and 2002.
    van Doornmalen JP; Dankert J
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Feb; 59(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15620446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial cell size and surface charge characteristics relevant to filter validation studies.
    Mittelman MW; Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9542413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.