These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Prospective randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans. Sweeney MO; Natale A; Volosin KJ; Swerdlow CD; Baker JH; Degroot P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jan; 24(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11227971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system. Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold. Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-tilt monophasic and biphasic waveforms compared with standard biphasic waveforms in the transvenous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation. Bennett JR; Darragh KM; Walsh SJ; Allen DJ; Scott M; Stevenson M; Adgey JA; Anderson JM; Manoharan G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Mar; 37(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 24102186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]