These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14675241)

  • 21. A decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guidelines for average-risk adults.
    Khandker RK; Dulski JD; Kilpatrick JB; Ellis RP; Mitchell JB; Baine WB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(3):799-810. PubMed ID: 11028135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A cost analysis of screening methodology for family members of colorectal cancer patients.
    Rozen P; Ron E
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1989 Dec; 84(12):1548-51. PubMed ID: 2512809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
    Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fecal occult blood testing: best option for colorectal cancer screening in Asia?
    Sharma SP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Aug; 100(15):1056-7. PubMed ID: 18664644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
    Sharp L; Tilson L; Whyte S; O'Ceilleachair A; Walsh C; Usher C; Tappenden P; Chilcott J; Staines A; Barry M; Comber H
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Feb; 106(5):805-16. PubMed ID: 22343624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
    Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Initial evaluation of rectal bleeding in young persons: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lewis JD; Brown A; Localio AR; Schwartz JS
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 11790061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines.
    Fisher JA; Fikry C; Troxel AB
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 16434595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients.
    Ko CW; Sonnenberg A
    Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 16230070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ladabaum U; Chopra CL; Huang G; Scheiman JM; Chernew ME; Fendrick AM
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):769-81. PubMed ID: 11694102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal use of colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test for population-based colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis using Japanese data.
    Sekiguchi M; Igarashi A; Matsuda T; Matsumoto M; Sakamoto T; Nakajima T; Kakugawa Y; Yamamoto S; Saito H; Saito Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 46(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 26685321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness of colon cancer screening.
    Lieberman D
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Dec; 86(12):1789-94. PubMed ID: 1962624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
    Patel SS; Kilgore ML
    Cancer Control; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 26068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
    Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.
    Winawer SJ; Flehinger BJ; Schottenfeld D; Miller DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Aug; 85(16):1311-8. PubMed ID: 8340943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Jodal HC; Helsingen LM; Anderson JC; Lytvyn L; Vandvik PO; Emilsson L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e032773. PubMed ID: 31578199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.
    Lejeune C; Arveux P; Dancourt V; Béjean S; Bonithon-Kopp C; Faivre J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 15609792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer.
    Telford JJ; Levy AR; Sambrook JC; Zou D; Enns RA
    CMAJ; 2010 Sep; 182(12):1307-13. PubMed ID: 20624866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.