191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14675655)
1. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts.
Koyuncu I; Topacik D; Wiesner MR
Water Res; 2004 Jan; 38(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 14675655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application.
Koyuncu I; Topacik D
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15137719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterisation and application of a novel positively charged nanofiltration membrane for the treatment of textile industry wastewaters.
Cheng S; Oatley DL; Williams PM; Wright CJ
Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 22078250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of the results for the synthetic and actual reactive dye bath effluent treatment by nanofiltration membranes.
Koyuncu I; Topacik D; Yuksel E
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2003; 38(10):2209-18. PubMed ID: 14524675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of dye solutions by vacuum membrane distillation.
Criscuoli A; Zhong J; Figoli A; Carnevale MC; Huang R; Drioli E
Water Res; 2008 Dec; 42(20):5031-7. PubMed ID: 18945467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The negative rejection of H+ in NF of carbonate solution and its influences on membrane performance.
Zhu A; Long F; Wang X; Zhu W; Ma J
Chemosphere; 2007 Apr; 67(8):1558-65. PubMed ID: 17250866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preparation of three-bore hollow fiber charged nanofiltration membrane for separation of organics and salts.
Deng J; Zhang Y; Liu J; Zhang H
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 22173422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater.
Liu ZY; Xie M; Ni F; Xu YH
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):816-22. PubMed ID: 22339015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regeneration of process water containing surfactants by nanofiltration--investigation and modelling of mass transport.
Wendler B; Goers B; Wozny G
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):287-92. PubMed ID: 12361023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions by polymer assisted ultrafiltration using experimental design approach: part 2: Optimization of hydrodynamic conditions for a crossflow ultrafiltration module with rotating part.
Cojocaru C; Zakrzewska-Trznadel G; Miskiewicz A
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):610-20. PubMed ID: 19414217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of operational parameters on cake formation of CaSO4 in nanofiltration.
Lin CJ; Shirazi S; Rao P; Agarwal S
Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):806-16. PubMed ID: 16427114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organic colloids and their influence on low-pressure membrane filtration.
Laabs C; Amy G; Jekel M
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(12):311-6. PubMed ID: 15686036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nanofiltration in the manufacture of liquid dyes production.
Mikulásek P; Cuhorka J
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(7):1865-73. PubMed ID: 20371946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting membrane flux decline from complex mixtures using flow-field flow fractionation measurements and semi-empirical theory.
Pellegrino J; Wright S; Ranvill J; Amy G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):85-92. PubMed ID: 16003965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Removal of textile dyes from textile dye effluent using TBAB based aqueous biphasic systems.
Dilip M; Venkateswaran P; Palanivelu K
J Environ Sci Eng; 2005 Jul; 47(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 16841455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decolorization of dyes and textile wastewater by potassium permanganate.
Xu XR; Li HB; Wang WH; Gu JD
Chemosphere; 2005 May; 59(6):893-8. PubMed ID: 15811419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of ozonation on the permeate flux of nanocrystalline ceramic membranes.
Karnik BS; Davies SH; Chen KC; Jaglowski DR; Baumann MJ; Masten SJ
Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):728-34. PubMed ID: 15707646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
