These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14676736)

  • 1. [Induction of labour: which method to use?].
    Tinelli A; Tinelli R; Tinelli FG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):463-82. PubMed ID: 14676736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of labour: new horizons.
    Brennand J; Greer I
    Hosp Med; 1998 Nov; 59(11):856-60. PubMed ID: 10197118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
    Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
    BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misoprostol use for cervical ripening and induction of labour in a Nigerian teaching hospital.
    Ekele BA; Nnadi DC; Gana MA; Shehu CE; Ahmed Y; Nwobodo EI
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2007 Sep; 10(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 18072452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
    Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture.
    Bujold E; Blackwell SC; Gauthier RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14704239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ripening of cervix for induction of labour by hydrostatic sweeping of membrane versus Foley's catheter ballooning alone.
    Ifnan F; Jameel MB
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2006 May; 16(5):347-50. PubMed ID: 16756780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
    Al-Taani MI
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
    Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical ripening. A review and recommendations for clinical practice.
    Poma PA
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):657-68. PubMed ID: 10483534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.