These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14676771)

  • 1. Brief communication: Bone trabeculae are visible on periapical images.
    Colosi D; Potluri A; Islam S; Geha H; Lurie A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Dec; 96(6):772-3. PubMed ID: 14676771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphodigital evaluation of the trabecular bone pattern in the mandible using digitized panoramic and periapical radiographs.
    Aranha Watanabe PC; Moreira Lopes De Faria L; Mardegan Issa JP; Caldeira Monteiro SA; Tiossi R
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):73-80. PubMed ID: 19357613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital image analysis of cadaver mandibular trabecular bone patterns.
    Shrout MK; Jett S; Mailhot JM; Potter BJ; Borke JL; Hildebolt CF
    J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1342-7. PubMed ID: 14584868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of trabecular bone in visibility of laminadura: A cross-sectional radiographic study.
    Singh TR; Jindal S; Singla A; Vinod Kumar AR; Damera A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 26275196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnosing periapical bone lesions on radiographs by means of texture analysis.
    Mol A; Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Jun; 73(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 1437047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visibility of trabecular structures in oral radiographs.
    Couture RA; Whiting BR; Hildebolt CF; Dixon DA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Dec; 96(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 14676770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical Bone Morphological and Trabecular Bone Microarchitectural Changes in the Mandible and Femoral Neck of Ovariectomized Rats.
    Hsu PY; Tsai MT; Wang SP; Chen YJ; Wu J; Hsu JT
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154367. PubMed ID: 27127909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologic interpretation of bone striae: an experimental study in vitro.
    Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Johnson WT; Southard TE; Jakobsen J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Sep; 88(3):353-7. PubMed ID: 10503868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible.
    Simons WF; De Smit M; Duyck J; Coucke W; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1051-9. PubMed ID: 24750281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible.
    Moon HS; Won YY; Kim KD; Ruprecht A; Kim HJ; Kook HK; Chung MK
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):466-73. PubMed ID: 15146293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of virtual simulation platform for investigation of the radiographic features of periapical bone lesion.
    Gao Y; Haapasalo M; Shen Y; Wu H; Jiang H; Zhou X
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1404-9. PubMed ID: 20647106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible.
    Lindh C; Petersson A; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 8884836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of trabecular bone to the visibility of the lamina dura: an in vitro radiographic study.
    Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Johnson WT; Southard TE; Jakobsen J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 11805787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.
    Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of image enhancement for detectability of bone lesions in digitized intraoral radiographs.
    Wenzel A
    Scand J Dent Res; 1988 Apr; 96(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 3162600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic study of the measurement of bone mineral content of cortical and cancellous bone of the mandible by computed tomography.
    Iwashita Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 10918453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.