433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14677180)
1. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. III. Comparative performance characteristics of academic and manufacturers' laboratories.
Fritzler MJ; Wiik A; Tan EM; Smolen JS; McDougal JS; Chan EK; Gordon TP; Hardin JA; Kalden JR; Lahita RG; Maini RN; Reeves WH; Rothfield NF; Takasaki Y; Wilson M; Byrd MG; Slivka L; Koziol JA
J Rheumatol; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2374-81. PubMed ID: 14677180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. II. Potential for quantitation of antibody content.
Tan EM; Smolen JS; McDougal JS; Fritzler MJ; Gordon T; Hardin JA; Kalden JR; Lahita RG; Maini RN; Reeves WH; Rothfield NF; Takasaki Y; Wiik A; Wilson M; Koziol JA
J Rheumatol; 2002 Jan; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 11824974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. I. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity.
Tan EM; Smolen JS; McDougal JS; Butcher BT; Conn D; Dawkins R; Fritzler MJ; Gordon T; Hardin JA; Kalden JR; Lahita RG; Maini RN; Rothfield NF; Smeenk R; Takasaki Y; van Venrooij WJ; Wiik A; Wilson M; Koziol JA
Arthritis Rheum; 1999 Mar; 42(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 10088768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of the methods used for the detection of antinuclear antibodies].
Berkem R; Gümüş T; Karakoç E; Acar N
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003; 37(2-3):171-8. PubMed ID: 14593900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods.
Homburger HA; Cahen YD; Griffiths J; Jacob GL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):993-9. PubMed ID: 9822128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of five commercial assays for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies: three Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test kits and two enzyme immunoassay kits.
Viriyataveekul R; Kobkitjaroen J; Jaiyen J; Kongkriengdach S; Potprasart S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb; 97(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 24765902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variations in performance characteristics of commercial enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies: what is the optimal cut off?
Holle JU; Hellmich B; Backes M; Gross WL; Csernok E
Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Dec; 64(12):1773-9. PubMed ID: 15843447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytic sensitivity and specificity of enzyme immunoassay results in testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody.
Cross GD; Schalla WO; Hancock JS; Hearn TL; Blumer SO; Taylor RN; Valdiserri RO
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 May; 116(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 1580749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the new multiplexed immunoassay, FIDIS, for simultaneous quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods.
Rouquette AM; Desgruelles C; Laroche P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Nov; 120(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 14608892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens by EIA and IF techniques.
Alem M; Moghadam S; Malki J; Zaidi A; Nayak N; Li TM
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1997 Sep; 29(7):188, 191-4. PubMed ID: 9373708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basics in standardization and practical applications of immunofluorescent microscopy: standardization of antinuclear antibody tests.
Beutner EH; Kumar V; Greenlee P
Lab Res Methods Biol Med; 1983; 8():49-70. PubMed ID: 6358746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicentre evaluation of commercial kit methods: plasminogen activator inhibitor activity.
Gram J; Declerck PJ; Sidelmann J; Jespersen J; Kluft C
Thromb Haemost; 1993 Nov; 70(5):852-7. PubMed ID: 8128445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective detection of autoimmune antibodies to single- and double-stranded DNA by enzyme immunoassay.
Makowski GS; Ramsby ML
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2003; 33(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 12817617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Zandman-Goddard G; Yehiely A; Langevitz P; Shoenfeld Y
Autoimmunity; 2005 Feb; 38(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 15804711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MBL quality control survey of autoantibodies--25 years of activity and its achievement--mainly antinuclear antibodies].
Tsunekawa S; Arai J; Ishihara Y; Fujii Y
Rinsho Byori; 2010 Feb; 58(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 20229811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of the antinuclear and anticytoplasmic antibody consensus panel by the Association of Medical Laboratory Immunologists.
James K; Carpenter AB; Cook L; Marchand R; Nakamura RM
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2000 May; 7(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 10799458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen: analysis of 510 healthy subjects: incidence of natural/predictive autoantibodies.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Barzilai O; Shinar E; Larida B; Zandman-Goddard G; Binder SR; Shoenfeld Y
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():380-8. PubMed ID: 16014555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Determination of autoimmune antibodies using Western blot technique in the routine laboratory. Problems with determining and comparing three test kits].
Bauerfeind S; Heide KG
Z Rheumatol; 1994; 53(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8023587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Diagnostic kits in parasitology: which controls?].
Rossi P
Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):145-9. PubMed ID: 15305705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of quality control on accuracy in enzyme immunoassay testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibodies.
Astles JR; Lipman HB; Schalla WO; Blumer SO; Fehd RJ; Smith C; Hearn TL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):700-7. PubMed ID: 9701331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
