199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1467821)
21. Intensity of treatment in malnutrition. The ethical considerations.
Goldstein MK; Fuller JD
Prim Care; 1994 Mar; 21(1):191-206. PubMed ID: 8197255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In re Smerdon.
Kraayeveld J
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 1765455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
Cantor NL
Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Withholding life-sustaining treatment: the case of Miss D.
Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 10184766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The permanently unconscious patient, non-feeding and euthanasia.
Cantor NL
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):381-437. PubMed ID: 2517381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Who shall live, who shall die. Who decides?
Hirsh HL; Cuneo MK
Med Law; 1986; 5(2):111-50. PubMed ID: 3713456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Substituted judgment, best interests, and the need for best respect.
Martyn SR
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1994; 3(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 8049767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Approaches (and possible contraindications) to enhancing patients' autonomy.
Howe EG
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 7841467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan: no rights violated.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Best interests in persistent vegetative state.
Fenwick AJ
J Med Ethics; 1999 Feb; 25(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 10070641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. From the Office of the General Counsel. Cruzan v Director of Missouri Department of Health: an ethical and legal perspective.
Orentlicher D
JAMA; 1989 Nov; 262(20):2928-30. PubMed ID: 2810631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to die.
Powell JA; Cohen AS
Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Practical problems in the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from two patients in a persistent vegetative state.
Richardson JP; Keay TJ
Arch Fam Med; 1993 Sep; 2(9):981-6. PubMed ID: 8111529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Impairments and impediments in patients' decision making: reframing the competence question.
Morreim EH
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(4):294-307; discussion 340-1. PubMed ID: 7803824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Getting down to cases.
Scofield GR
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 1938336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical care.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1988 Feb; 84(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 3044071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. When patients resist feeding. Medical, ethical, and legal considerations.
Dresser R
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1985 Nov; 33(11):790-4. PubMed ID: 3932504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Causing death or allowing to die? A rejoinder to Randall's comments.
Ferguson PR
J Med Ethics; 1998 Aug; 24(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 9752635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
