These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

914 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14678571)

  • 1. Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures.
    Uhari M; Renko M; Soini H
    BMC Med Educ; 2003 Dec; 3():12. PubMed ID: 14678571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet?
    Cardall S; Krupat E; Ulrich M
    Acad Med; 2008 Dec; 83(12):1174-8. PubMed ID: 19202495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
    Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lecture attendance improves success in medical physiology.
    Demir EA; Tutuk O; Dogan H; Egeli D; Tumer C
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Dec; 41(4):599-603. PubMed ID: 29138218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [THE DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE PLACE OF LECTURES AND COMPULSORY LECTURE ATTENDANCE IN MEDICAL EDUCATION].
    Reis S
    Harefuah; 2016 Apr; 155(4):226-8, 254. PubMed ID: 27323539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lectures in medical educaton: what students think?
    Mustafa T; Farooq Z; Asad Z; Amjad R; Badar I; Chaudhry AM; Khan MA; Rafique F
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 25358209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic voting to encourage interactive lectures: a randomised trial.
    Duggan PM; Palmer E; Devitt P
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 7():25. PubMed ID: 17655773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical biochemistry: Is it time to change the teaching style?
    Palocaren J; Pillai LS; Celine TM
    Natl Med J India; 2016; 29(4):222-224. PubMed ID: 28051002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Encouraging experiences of interactive lectures].
    Lehtonen S; Linden AM; Ojala PM; Polvi A; Sallinen V; Viranta S
    Duodecim; 2009; 125(20):2199-205. PubMed ID: 19998758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds.
    Ernst H; Colthorpe K
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Mar; 31(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 17327581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Teaching medical students neonatal resuscitation: knowledge gained and retained from a brief simulation-based training workshop.
    Lai NM; Ngim CF; Fullerton PD
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2012 Nov; 25(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 23823593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Twelve tips for effective lecturing in a PBL curriculum.
    Malik AS; Malik RH
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 22364451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interactive Learning: Online Audience Response System and Multiple Choice Questions Improve Student Participation in Lectures.
    Goyal M; Agarwal M; Goel A
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42527. PubMed ID: 37637674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive lecturing.
    White G
    Clin Teach; 2011 Dec; 8(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 22084997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The interactive lecture. A simple form of student-activating learning].
    Quistorff B; Aspegren K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Sep; 165(36):3400-3. PubMed ID: 14531140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of e-learning, lectures, and role playing on nursing students' knowledge acquisition, retention and satisfaction.
    Pourghaznein T; Sabeghi H; Shariatinejad K
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2015; 29():162. PubMed ID: 26000257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708.
    Solomon DJ; Ferenchick GS; Laird-Fick HS; Kavanaugh K
    BMC Med Educ; 2004 Nov; 4():27. PubMed ID: 15569389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course.
    Miller CJ; McNear J; Metz MJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Dec; 37(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 24292912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Lecturing--an enduring teaching method].
    Eika B; Wichmann-Hansen G; Høyer CS; Mørcke AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Oct; 170(44):3520-3. PubMed ID: 18976612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.