905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14679434)
1. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].
Migaud H; Jardin C; Fontaine C; Pierchon F; d'Herbomez O; Duquennoy A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 9452810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The uncemented isoelastic/isotitan total hip arthroplasty. A 10-15 years follow-up with bone mineral density evaluation.
Nagi ON; Kumar S; Aggarwal S
Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Jan; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16570896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA.
Aldinger PR; Sabo D; Pritsch M; Thomsen M; Mau H; Ewerbeck V; Breusch SJ
Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Aug; 73(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 14565592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
Digas G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the cemented Exeter stem: a prospective study in 18 women with 5 years follow-up.
Damborg F; Nissen N; Jørgensen HR; Abrahamsen B; Brixen K
Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 18766482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Periprosthetic bone remodeling using a triple-taper polished cemented stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Buckland AJ; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD; Hardidge AJ; Ng KW; Choong PF
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Oct; 25(7):1083-90. PubMed ID: 19879719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized comparison between 3 surface treatments of a single anteverted stem design: 84 hips followed for 5 years.
Thien TM; Thanner J; Kärrholm J
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):437-444.e1. PubMed ID: 19232887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective study of proximal femur bone mass following cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasty.
Marchetti ME; Steinberg GG; Greene JM; Jenis LG; Baran DT
J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jul; 11(7):1033-9. PubMed ID: 8797126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Good survival of uncemented tapered stems for failed intertrochanteric osteotomy: a mean 16 year follow-up study in 45 patients.
Parsch D; Jung AW; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Aldinger PR
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Oct; 128(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 17876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems.
Kim YH; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jun; 20(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 16124960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Changes of periprosthetic bone mineral density in cementless bicontact stem implantation; influence of different parameters--a prospective 4-year follow-up].
Reiter A; Gellrich JC; Bachmann J; Braun A
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 12822075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
