155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14679877)
1. Hydrogen sulfide assessment in shallow-pit swine housing and outside manure storage.
Chénard L; Lemay SP; Laguë C
J Agric Saf Health; 2003 Nov; 9(4):285-302. PubMed ID: 14679877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operator Exposure to Hydrogen Sulfide from Dairy Manure Storages Containing Gypsum Bedding.
Fabian-Wheeler EE; Hile ML; Murphy DJ; Hill DE; Meinen R; Brandt RC; Elliott HA; Hofstetter D
J Agric Saf Health; 2017 Jan; 23(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 29140615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occupational Exposure Risk for Swine Workers in Confined Housing Facilities.
Alvarado AC; Predicala BZ
J Agric Saf Health; 2019 Feb; 25(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 30893975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and odor before, during, and after slurry removal from a deep-pit swine finisher.
Hoff SJ; Bundy DS; Nelson MA; Zelle BC; Jacobson LD; Heber AJ; Ni J; Zhang Y; Koziel JA; Beasley DB
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 May; 56(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 16739794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening ventilation strategies for confined-space manure storage facilities.
Pesce EP; Zhao J; Manbeck HB; Murphy DJ
J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jul; 14(3):283-308. PubMed ID: 18788331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of ventilation of confined-space manure storage facilities: applications.
Zhao J; Manbeck HB; Murphy DJ
J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Oct; 14(4):405-29. PubMed ID: 19044169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nutrient composition of Kansas swine lagoons and hoop barn manure.
DeRoucheys JM; Goodband RD; Nelssen JL; Tokach MD; Dritz SS; Murphy JP
J Anim Sci; 2002 Aug; 80(8):2051-61. PubMed ID: 12211372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from swine production facilities in North America: a meta-analysis.
Liu Z; Powers W; Murphy J; Maghirang R
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1656-65. PubMed ID: 24492567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of handling parameters on hydrogen sulfide emission from stored dairy manure.
Andriamanohiarisoamanana FJ; Sakamoto Y; Yamashiro T; Yasui S; Iwasaki M; Ihara I; Tsuji O; Umetsu K
J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():110-6. PubMed ID: 25721978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operator and Potential Exposure to Hydrogen Sulfide: A Study of the British Columbia Dairy Industry.
O'Leary T; Merkowsky K; Trask C; Bennett W; Kirychuk S
J Agromedicine; 2021 Oct; 26(4):381-388. PubMed ID: 32744179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Low-Cost Hydrogen Sulfide Monitors for Use in Livestock Production.
Beswick-Honn JM; Peters TM; Anthony TR
J Agric Saf Health; 2017 Nov; 23(4):265-279. PubMed ID: 29140644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working with cattle slurry on farms: emission and dispersion of hydrogen sulfide gas during stirring.
Gyte A; Kelsey A
Ann Work Expo Health; 2024 Apr; 68(4):387-396. PubMed ID: 38527239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Annual variations of odor concentrations and emissions from swine gestation, farrowing, and nursery buildings.
Guo H; Wang Y; Yuan Y
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Dec; 61(12):1361-8. PubMed ID: 22263424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Gestation Pens Versus Stalls and Wet Versus Dry Feed on Air Contaminants in Swine Production.
Raynor PC; Engelman S; Murphy D; Ramachandran G; Bender JB; Alexander BH
J Agromedicine; 2018; 23(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 28976266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrogen sulfide concentrations at three middle schools near industrial livestock facilities.
Guidry VT; Kinlaw AC; Johnston J; Hall D; Wing S
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 27(2):167-174. PubMed ID: 27094997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a plant material-based air purifier for removing H2S, NH3 and swine manure odour.
Zhou X; Zhang Q; Huang A
Environ Technol; 2012 Dec; 33(22-24):2751-6. PubMed ID: 23437676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of in-barn manure separation on biological air quality in an experimental setup identical to that in swine buildings.
Lavoie J; Godbout S; Lemay SP; Belzile M
J Agric Saf Health; 2009 Jul; 15(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 19728546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The design and use of the Personal Environmental Sampling Backpack (PESB II) for activity-specific exposure monitoring of career pig barn workers.
Wenger II; Ouellette CA; Feddes JJ; Hrudey SE
J Agric Saf Health; 2005 Aug; 11(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 16184790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.
Létourneau V; Nehmé B; Mériaux A; Massé D; Duchaine C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19953413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of air quality at neighbor residences in the vicinity of swine production facilities.
Donham KJ; Lee JA; Thu K; Reynolds SJ
J Agromedicine; 2006; 11(3-4):15-24. PubMed ID: 19274894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
