These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14681002)

  • 21. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces.
    Hershler O; Hochstein S
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
    Van der Burg E; Olivers CN; Bronkhorst AW; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1053-65. PubMed ID: 18823194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A neural network implementation of a saliency map model.
    de Brecht M; Saiki J
    Neural Netw; 2006 Dec; 19(10):1467-74. PubMed ID: 16687235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does training under consistent mapping conditions lead to automatic attention attraction to targets in search tasks?
    Lefebvre C; Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1401-15. PubMed ID: 19064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?
    Raymond JE; Fenske MJ; Westoby N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1404-15. PubMed ID: 16366798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):788-97. PubMed ID: 17683228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The eyes have it: visual pop-out in infants and adults.
    Adler SA; Orprecio J
    Dev Sci; 2006 Mar; 9(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 16472320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduction and elimination of format effects on recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Krusemark DC
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):377-94. PubMed ID: 18792716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The magnitude of binocular disparity modulates search time for targets defined by a conjunction of depth and colour.
    de la Rosa S; Moraglia G; Schneider BA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 18778143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants.
    Amso D; Johnson SP
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder?
    Joseph RM; Keehn B; Connolly C; Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS
    Dev Sci; 2009 Nov; 12(6):1083-96. PubMed ID: 19840062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Visual search attention in children with Williams syndrome].
    Xie CH; Shao J; Qin YF; Yang JB; Wang YX; Li R; Zhao ZY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 88(10):679-83. PubMed ID: 18642768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Haptic pop-out in a hand sweep.
    Plaisier MA; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):368-77. PubMed ID: 18471795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?
    Alvarez GA; Horowitz TS; Arsenio HC; Dimase JS; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):643-67. PubMed ID: 16131240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of lateral implicit visual affective stimuli on the evaluation of neutral stimuli in humans.
    Kobylinska D; Karwowska D
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2007; 67(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 17474325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.