These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access? Rickard TC; Bajic D Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):243-94. PubMed ID: 15020213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Pachur T; Hertwig R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):983-1002. PubMed ID: 16938041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall. Rutherford A Mem Cognit; 2000 Dec; 28(8):1419-28. PubMed ID: 11219969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluent, fast, and frugal? A formal model evaluation of the interplay between memory, fluency, and comparative judgments. Hilbig BE; Erdfelder E; Pohl RF J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):827-39. PubMed ID: 21355665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI. de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of post-cue interval on intentional forgetting. Lee YS; Lee HM; Tsai SH Br J Psychol; 2007 May; 98(Pt 2):257-72. PubMed ID: 17456272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Malmberg KJ; Shiffrin RM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):322-36. PubMed ID: 15755248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Memory search following valid and invalid abrupt-onset cues. Homa D; Newton C; Terry D; Schafer S; Richter K Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):383-413. PubMed ID: 17892085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models. Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Koriat A; Levy-Sadot R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):34-53. PubMed ID: 11204106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition. Lamberts K; Brockdorff N; Heit E J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Sep; 132(3):351-78. PubMed ID: 13678373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Video context-dependent recall. Smith SM; Manzano I Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):292-301. PubMed ID: 20160308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using preexperimental familiarity to compare the ICE and cue-overload accounts of context-dependent memory in item recognition. Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I; Hockley WE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):533-546. PubMed ID: 36227292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental cue saliency influences the vividness of a remote spatial memory in rats. Lopez J; de Vasconcelos AP; Cassel JC Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 Jul; 90(1):285-9. PubMed ID: 18353694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]