These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14681273)

  • 1. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
    Schatzkin A; Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Troiano RP; Freedman LS
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 14681273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.
    Kipnis V; Subar AF; Midthune D; Freedman LS; Ballard-Barbash R; Troiano RP; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Schatzkin A; Carroll RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):14-21; discussion 22-6. PubMed ID: 12835281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.
    Trijsburg L; de Vries JH; Boshuizen HC; Hulshof PJ; Hollman PC; van 't Veer P; Geelen A
    Br J Nutr; 2015 Oct; 114(8):1304-12. PubMed ID: 26314241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of dietary taste patterns as assessed by FFQ against 24-h recalls and biomarkers of exposure.
    van Langeveld AWB; Teo PS; Mars M; Feskens EJM; de Graaf C; de Vries JHM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jan; 73(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 30254242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. OPEN about obesity: recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI.
    Lissner L; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Heitmann BL; Kipnis V; Subar AF; Potischman N
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jun; 31(6):956-61. PubMed ID: 17299385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.
    Subar AF; Kipnis V; Troiano RP; Midthune D; Schoeller DA; Bingham S; Sharbaugh CO; Trabulsi J; Runswick S; Ballard-Barbash R; Sunshine J; Schatzkin A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 158(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 12835280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of the Goldberg method for classifying misreporters of energy intake on a food frequency questionnaire and 24-h recalls: comparison with doubly labeled water.
    Tooze JA; Krebs-Smith SM; Troiano RP; Subar AF
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2012 May; 66(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22127332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. FFQ versus repeated 24-h recalls for estimating diet-related environmental impact.
    Mertens E; Kuijsten A; Geleijnse JM; Boshuizen HC; Feskens EJM; Van't Veer P
    Nutr J; 2019 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 30621736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy Intake in Socially Vulnerable Women Living in Brazil: Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Methods of Dietary Intake Recording Using Doubly Labeled Water.
    Lins ILL; Bueno NB; Grotti Clemente AP; Pfrimer K; Sawaya AL; de Menezes Toledo Florêncio TM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Oct; 116(10):1560-1567. PubMed ID: 27083987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating an FFQ for intake of episodically consumed foods: application to the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.
    Midthune D; Schatzkin A; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Freedman LS; Carroll RJ; Shumakovich MA; Kipnis V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Jul; 14(7):1212-21. PubMed ID: 21486523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of approaches to correct intake–health associations for FFQ measurement error using a duplicate recovery biomarker and a duplicate 24 h dietary recall as reference method.
    Geelen A; Souverein OW; Busstra MC; de Vries JH; van't Veer P
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Feb; 18(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 24499731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility and relative validity of an extensive semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire using dietary records and biochemical markers among Greek schoolteachers.
    Katsouyanni K; Rimm EB; Gnardellis C; Trichopoulos D; Polychronopoulos E; Trichopoulou A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S118-27. PubMed ID: 9126540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Semi-Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Validated in Hispanic Infants and Toddlers Aged 0 to 24 Months.
    Palacios C; Rivas-Tumanyan S; Santiago-Rodríguez EJ; Sinigaglia O; Ríos EM; Campos M; Diaz B; Willett W
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Apr; 117(4):526-535.e9. PubMed ID: 28188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
    Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors relating to eating style, social desirability, body image and eating meals at home increase the precision of calibration equations correcting self-report measures of diet using recovery biomarkers: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.
    Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Tinker LF; Huang Y; Neuhouser ML; McCann SE; Seguin RA; Vitolins MZ; Curb JD; Prentice RL
    Nutr J; 2013 May; 12():63. PubMed ID: 23679960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of a new food frequency questionnaire compared to 24 h recalls and biochemical measurements: pilot phase of Golestan cohort study of esophageal cancer.
    Malekshah AF; Kimiagar M; Saadatian-Elahi M; Pourshams A; Nouraie M; Goglani G; Hoshiarrad A; Sadatsafavi M; Golestan B; Yoonesi A; Rakhshani N; Fahimi S; Nasrollahzadeh D; Salahi R; Ghafarpour A; Semnani S; Steghens JP; Abnet CC; Kamangar F; Dawsey SM; Brennan P; Boffetta P; Malekzadeh R
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2006 Aug; 60(8):971-7. PubMed ID: 16465196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study.
    Tooze JA; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Troiano R; Schatzkin A; Kipnis V
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2004 May; 79(5):795-804. PubMed ID: 15113717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study.
    Subar AF; Midthune D; Tasevska N; Kipnis V; Freedman LS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2013 Aug; 67(8):863-7. PubMed ID: 23486508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility and relative validity of energy and macronutrient intake of a food frequency questionnaire developed for the German part of the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.
    Bohlscheid-Thomas S; Hoting I; Boeing H; Wahrendorf J
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997; 26 Suppl 1():S71-81. PubMed ID: 9126535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.