89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14681277)
1. Efficiency of two-phase designs for prevalence estimation.
McNamee R
Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1072-8. PubMed ID: 14681277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal designs of two-stage studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value.
McNamee R
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3609-25. PubMed ID: 12436459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-phase sampling for simultaneous prevalence estimation and case detection.
McNamee R
Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 15339302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designing 2-phase prevalence studies in the absence of a "gold standard" test.
Salim A; Welsh AH
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 170(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 19505999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-efficient case-control cluster sampling designs for population-based epidemiological studies.
Ly T; Cockburn M; Langholz B
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 26():95-105. PubMed ID: 30390934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficiency of EPI cluster sampling for assessing diarrhoea and dysentery prevalence.
Yoon SS; Katz J; Brendel K; West KP
Bull World Health Organ; 1997; 75(5):417-26. PubMed ID: 9447775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the estimation of the incidence and prevalence in two-phase longitudinal sampling design.
Banerjee P; Ghosh S
Biostatistics; 2020 Apr; 21(2):202-218. PubMed ID: 30165583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid sexually transmitted disease assessment in two developing countries.
Roseberry WL; Heymann DL; Ndoye I; Nsubuga PS
Sex Transm Dis; 1994; 21(2 Suppl):S84-5. PubMed ID: 8042125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage sampling in surveys to substantiate freedom from disease.
Cameron AR; Baldock FC
Prev Vet Med; 1998 Feb; 34(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 9541948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [INFORNUT process: validation of the filter phase-FILNUT--and comparison with other methods for the detection of early hospital hyponutrition].
Villalobos Gámez JL; García-Almeida JM; Guzmán de Damas JM; Rioja Vázquez R; Osorio Fernández D; Rodríguez-García LM; del Río Mata J; Ortiz García C; Gutiérrez Bedmar M
Nutr Hosp; 2006; 21(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 16913209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Epidemiologic Note on Verification Bias: Implications for Estimation of Rates.
Gambino B
J Gambl Stud; 1999; 15(3):223-232. PubMed ID: 12766460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost-effectiveness of reclassification sampling for prevalence estimation.
Bekmetjev A; VanBruggen D; McLellan B; DeWinkle B; Lunderberg E; Tintle N
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32058. PubMed ID: 22348146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence in two-phase surveys: accuracy of screening procedure and corrected estimates.
Morvan J; Coste J; Roux CH; Euller-Ziegler L; Saraux A; Guillemin F
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):261-9. PubMed ID: 18374278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low.
Obuchowski NA; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2002 Dec; 3(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 12933593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating population size with two- and three-stage sampling designs.
Tate JE; Hudgens MG
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 165(11):1314-20. PubMed ID: 17400569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does sampling using random digit dialling really cost more than sampling from telephone directories: debunking the myths.
Yang B; Eyeson-Annan M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():6. PubMed ID: 16504117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptation of multiple logistic regression to a multiple inverse sampling design: application to the Isfahan healthy heart program.
Salehi MM; Levy PS; Jamalzadeh MA; Chang KC
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 16217852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of infection prevalence and sensitivity in a stratified two-stage sampling design employing highly specific diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard.
Miller E; Huppert A; Novikov I; Warburg A; Hailu A; Abbasi I; Freedman LS
Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3349-61. PubMed ID: 26033190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive sampling in two-phase designs: a biomarker study for progression in arthritis.
McIsaac MA; Cook RJ
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2899-912. PubMed ID: 25951124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A method for determining the sampling ratio in epidemiologic studies.
Morgenstern H; Winn DM
Stat Med; 1983; 2(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 6417752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
