564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14681944)
1. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: analysis of outcome for 182 lesions detected in the setting of a population-based breast cancer screening program.
Farshid G; Rush G
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 14681944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Core imprint cytology of screen-detected breast lesions is predictive of the histologic results.
Farshid G; Pieterse S
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 16634070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma.
Eloubeidi MA; Jhala D; Chhieng DC; Chen VK; Eltoum I; Vickers S; Mel Wilcox C; Jhala N
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 14579295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifications.
Farshid G; Pieterse S; King JM; Robinson J
Breast J; 2005; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15647073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of 1183 screen-detected, category 3B, circumscribed masses by cytology and core biopsy with long-term follow up data.
Farshid G; Downey P; Gill P; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 98(7):1182-90. PubMed ID: 18382460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Aid to diagnosis?].
Chopier J; Seror JY; Antoine M; Sananes S; Merviel P; Amram S; Uzan S; Bigot JM
J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 78(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9499951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammary lesions diagnosed as "papillary" by aspiration biopsy: 70 cases with follow-up.
Simsir A; Waisman J; Thorner K; Cangiarella J
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):156-65. PubMed ID: 12811856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of palpable breast lesions.
Rosa M; Mohammadi A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Jan; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22180235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings].
Vanoli C; Antronaco R; Giovanella L; Ceriani L; Sessa F; Fugazzola C
Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance indices of needle biopsy procedures for the assessment of screen detected abnormalities in services accredited by BreastScreen Australia.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Jones S; Roder D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10665-73. PubMed ID: 25605157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy of isolated breast microcalcifications identified by mammography. Experience with a vacuum-assisted large-core biopsy device.
Ambrogetti D; Bianchi S; Ciatto S
Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 14612823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clustered intramammary microcalcifications not associated with a mass.
Fok CM; Reynolds VB; Tan KA; Ong CL; Chong PY
Singapore Med J; 1995 Feb; 36(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7570130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
