These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1468355)
1. New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography. Hawlina M; Konec B Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 81(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 1468355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design of a new disposable ERG electrode. Hiroi K; Miyake M; Hashimoto T; Honda Y Ophthalmologica; 1995; 209(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 8751335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for patterns electroretinograms. McCulloch DL; Van Boemel GB; Borchert MS Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 9858093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes. Hennessy MP; Vaegan Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 89(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 7555591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults. Bradshaw K; Hansen R; Fulton A Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 109(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15675199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a new fiber electrode prototype for clinical electroretinography. Berezovsky A; Pereira JM; Salomão SR; Santos VR; Schor P Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18641814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gold foil electrodes: a two-center study of electrode reliability. Arden GB; Hogg CR; Holder GE Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 7813379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of different recording parameters to establish a standard for flash electroretinography in rodents. Bayer AU; Cook P; Brodie SE; Maag KP; Mittag T Vision Res; 2001 Aug; 41(17):2173-85. PubMed ID: 11448710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal wick electrode for recording bright flash electroretinograms and early receptor potentials. Sieving PA; Fishman GA; Maggiano JM Arch Ophthalmol; 1978 May; 96(5):899-900. PubMed ID: 655931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode. Kriss A Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 May; 16(2-3):137-46. PubMed ID: 8089032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new speculum electrode for electroretinography. Lachapelle P; Blain L J Neurosci Methods; 1990 Jun; 32(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 2385141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An electrode to record the mouse cornea electroretinogram. Goto Y Doc Ophthalmol; 1995-1996; 91(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 8813494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes. Giltrow-Tyler JF; Crews SJ; Drasdo N Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1978 Nov; 17(11):1124-7. PubMed ID: 700963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]