These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14683731)

  • 1. The use of anatomical constraints with MEG beamformers.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2003 Dec; 20(4):2302-13. PubMed ID: 14683731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing interactions of linear and nonlinear neuronal sources using MEG beamformers: a proof of concept.
    Hadjipapas A; Hillebrand A; Holliday IE; Singh KD; Barnes GR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1300-13. PubMed ID: 15978493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical constraints on estimation of source extent with MEG beamformers.
    Hillebrand A; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(4):2732-40. PubMed ID: 20969964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging.
    Brookes MJ; Vrba J; Robinson SE; Stevenson CM; Peters AM; Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Morris PG
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1788-802. PubMed ID: 18155612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
    Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.
    Steinsträter O; Sillekens S; Junghoefer M; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1907-27. PubMed ID: 21086549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-Gaussian probabilistic MEG source localisation based on kernel density estimation.
    Mohseni HR; Kringelbach ML; Woolrich MW; Baker A; Aziz TZ; Probert-Smith P
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():444-64. PubMed ID: 24055702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voxel-ICA for reconstruction of source signal time-series and orientation in EEG and MEG.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Poudel G; Innes C; Jones R
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 24706341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The LDA beamformer: Optimal estimation of ERP source time series using linear discriminant analysis.
    Treder MS; Porbadnigk AK; Shahbazi Avarvand F; Müller KR; Blankertz B
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():279-291. PubMed ID: 26804780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
    Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging.
    Huang MX; Shih JJ; Lee RR; Harrington DL; Thoma RJ; Weisend MP; Hanlon F; Paulson KM; Li T; Martin K; Millers GA; Canive JM
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(3):139-58. PubMed ID: 15162912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.
    Hong JH; Ahn M; Kim K; Jun SC
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1121-35. PubMed ID: 23793511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
    Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI constrained magnetoencephalography data: Monte Carlo simulations.
    Liu AK; Belliveau JW; Dale AM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Jul; 95(15):8945-50. PubMed ID: 9671784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the performance of beamformer algorithms in estimating orientations of neural sources.
    Buschermöhle Y; Höltershinken MB; Erdbrügger T; Radecke JO; Sprenger A; Schneider TR; Lencer R; Gross J; Wolters CH
    iScience; 2024 Mar; 27(3):109150. PubMed ID: 38420593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.