100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14684189)
1. An innovative dosimetric model for formulating a semi-analytical solution for the activity-volume relationship in prostate implants.
Lee PC; Parks EK; Moran BJ
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 14684189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Wallner KE; Blasko JC; Michalski J; Aronowitz J; Grimm P; Moran BJ; McLaughlin PW; Usher J; Lief JH; Allen ZA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16344253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors predicting for urinary incontinence after prostate brachytherapy.
McElveen TL; Waterman FM; Kim H; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Aug; 59(5):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15275725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of MRI- and CT-based post-implant dosimetric analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Prete JJ; Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Dubois DF; Hotchkiss LA
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1998; 6(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 9572685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the cost of permanent prostate implants be reduced? An argument for peripheral loading with higher strength seeds.
Maguire PD; Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Tech Urol; 2000 Jun; 6(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 10798805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability.
D'Souza WD; Thames HD; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15050335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of random seed placement error in permanent transperineal prostate seed implant.
Bues M; Holupka EJ; Meskell P; Kaplan ID
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Apr; 79(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16515813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs.
Beaulieu L; Archambault L; Aubin S; Oral E; Taschereau R; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1298-308. PubMed ID: 15001275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is a loose-seed nomogram still valid for prostate brachytherapy in a stranded-seed era?
Kudchadker RJ; Swanson DA; Kuban DA; Lee AK; Bruno TL; Frank SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Oct; 72(2):623-7. PubMed ID: 18410998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: a comparison between higher and lower source density.
Thomas CW; Kruk A; McGahan CE; Spadinger I; Morris WJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Apr; 83(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 192Ir or 125I prostate brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy in locally advanced prostatic cancer: a dosimetric point of view.
Nickers P; Thissen B; Jansen N; Deneufbourg JM
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jan; 78(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16216365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized trial of high- and low-source strength (125)I prostate seed implants.
Narayana V; Troyer S; Evans V; Winfield RJ; Roberson PL; McLaughlin PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 15629592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy.
Butler WM; Merrick GS; Lief JH; Dorsey AT
Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):381-92. PubMed ID: 10718143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostatic conformal brachytherapy: 125I/103Pd postoperative dosimetric analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Walbert HL
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1997; 5(6):305-13. PubMed ID: 9436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Favorable toxicity and biochemical control using real-time inverse optimization technique for prostate brachytherapy.
Raben A; Rusthoven KE; Sarkar A; Glick A; Benge B; Jacobs D; Raben D
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 19213608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
