388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14684521)
1. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Kim SM; Kwon GY; Gong G; Cho OK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):516-25. PubMed ID: 18212241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonographic detection and characterization of asymptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Gwak YJ; Kim HJ; Kwak JY; Lee SK; Shin KM; Lee HJ; Kim GC; Jang YJ; Han MH; Park JY; Jung JH
Acta Radiol; 2011 May; 52(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 21498298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: imaging findings.
Soo MS; Williford ME; Walsh R; Bentley RC; Kornguth PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 7839962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.
Houssami N; Irwig L; Simpson JM; McKessar M; Blome S; Noakes J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):935-40. PubMed ID: 12646432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonography- and/or mammography-guided breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: experience with 87 lesions.
Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Abe E; Kikuchi M; Enokido K; Tsugawa K; Suzuki K; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2012 Apr; 19(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20725871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between sonographic findings and clinicopathologic and biologic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ in 691 patients.
Scoggins ME; Fox PS; Kuerer HM; Rauch GM; Benveniste AP; Park YM; Lari SA; Krishnamurthy S; Yang WT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 25794082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic significance of multiple morphologic features and biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a study of a large cohort of patients treated with surgery alone.
Cornfield DB; Palazzo JP; Schwartz GF; Goonewardene SA; Kovatich AJ; Chervoneva I; Hyslop T; Schwarting R
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2317-27. PubMed ID: 15160334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: ultrasonographic, mammographic and histopathologic correlations.
Jin ZQ; Lin MY; Hao WQ; Jiang HT; Zhang L; Hu WH; Zhang M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 25479813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):941-8. PubMed ID: 12646433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.
Soo MS; Baker JA; Rosen EL; Vo TT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Apr; 178(4):1007-15. PubMed ID: 11906892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging features of micropapillary DCIS: correlation with clinical and histopathological findings.
Lee YS; Mathew J; Dogan BE; Resetkova E; Huo L; Yang WT
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):797-803. PubMed ID: 21419669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of predictive factors, particularly the Van Nuys index, of local recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: study of 166 cases with conservative treatment and review of the literature].
Denoux Y; Marnay J; Crouet H; Boute V; Delozier T; Vie B; Chasle J
Bull Cancer; 2001 Apr; 88(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11371378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [In situ ductal carcinoma of the breast: a diagnostic challenge].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):69-73. PubMed ID: 12621847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic and histopathologic correlation of nonpalpable lesions of the breast and the reliability of frozen section diagnosis.
Tinnemans JG; Wobbes T; Holland R; Hendriks JH; van der Sluis RF; Lubbers EJ; de Boer HH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Dec; 165(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 2825366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
