159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14685681)
41. Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography?
Haberal I; Celik H; Göçmen H; Akmansu H; Yörük M; Ozeri C
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Feb; 130(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 14990916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Management of malignant melanoma.
Kroon BB; Nieweg OE
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 2000; 89(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 11079795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pretreatment sonographic evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar malignancy.
Mäkelä PJ; Leminen A; Kääriäinen M; Lehtovirta P
J Ultrasound Med; 1993 May; 12(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 8345551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Cervical lymph node metastasis: significance of computerized tomography and palpation. A histologically controlled comparison].
Steinkamp HJ; Zwicker C; Langer M; Mathe F; Uhrmeister P
Rofo; 1991 Oct; 155(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 1932725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Ultrasonographic evaluation of superficial lymph node metastases in melanoma.
Tregnaghi A; De Candia A; Calderone M; Cellini L; Rossi CR; Talenti E; Blandamura S; Borsato S; Muzzio PC; Rubaltelli L
Eur J Radiol; 1997 May; 24(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 9232392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma.
Herrada J; Iyer RB; Atkinson EN; Sneige N; Buzdar AU; Hortobagyi GN
Clin Cancer Res; 1997 Sep; 3(9):1565-9. PubMed ID: 9815844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Palpation, ultrasound, and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the assessment of cervical lymph node status in head and neck cancer patients.
Atula TS; Grénman R; Varpula MJ; Kurki TJ; Klemi PJ
Head Neck; 1996; 18(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 8902568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Lymph node metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma: improvements in diagnosis by signal-enhanced color Doppler sonography.
Schmid-Wendtner MH; Dill-Müller D; Baumert J; Wagner A; Eberle J; Tilgen W; Plewig G
Melanoma Res; 2004 Aug; 14(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 15305157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Value of ultrasonography compared with physical examination for the detection of locoregional metastases in patients with cutaneous melanoma.
Schmid-Wendtner MH; Paerschke G; Baumert J; Plewig G; Volkenandt M
Melanoma Res; 2003 Apr; 13(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 12690303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Identification of the sentinel lymph node in patients with malignant melanoma: what are the reasons for mistakes?
Vidal-Sicart S; Pons F; Puig S; Ortega M; Vilalta A; Martín F; Rull R; Palou JM; Castel T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Mar; 30(3):362-6. PubMed ID: 12634963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The impact of ultrasound scanning in the staging and follow-up of patients with clinical stage I cutaneous melanoma.
Rossi CR; Seno A; Vecchiato A; Foletto M; Tregnaghi A; De Candia A; Rubaltelli L; Montesco C; Lise M
Eur J Cancer; 1997 Feb; 33(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 9135488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Preoperative ultrasonographic identification of the sentinel lymph node in patients with malignant melanoma.
Kahle B; Hoffend J; Wacker J; Hartschuh W
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(8):1947-54. PubMed ID: 12673722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy with ultrasound guidance in patients with malignant melanoma and palpable lymph nodes.
Dalle S; Paulin C; Lapras V; Balme B; Ronger-Savle S; Thomas L
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 155(3):552-6. PubMed ID: 16911280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in cervical lymph node metastasis].
Wang S; Zhang R; Shu J; Lu Z; Zhu C; Chen X; Ge X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 13(8):352-3. PubMed ID: 12541360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Important prognostic significance of a sentinel-node biopsy in patients with malignant melanoma].
Keijzer R; Bril H; van der Loo EM; de Graaf PW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 May; 148(18):884-8. PubMed ID: 15152391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reliability of sentinel lymph-node extirpation as a diagnostic method for malignant melanoma of the head and neck region.
Teltzrow T; Osinga J; Schwipper V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jun; 36(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 17418530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Sentinel lymph nodes in cutaneous melanoma: the experience in the Florence area].
Urso C; Borgognoni L; Vaggelli L; Giannini A; Salvadori A; Zini E; Reali UM
Pathologica; 2003 Jun; 95(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 12968307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Accuracy of the non-sentinel node risk score (N-SNORE) in patients with cutaneous melanoma and positive sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective study.
Feldmann R; Fink AM; Jurecka W; Rappersberger K; Steiner A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 24075029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy of the groin in clinically node-negative melanoma patients: superficial or superficial and deep lymph node dissection?
van der Ploeg IM; Valdés Olmos RA; Kroon BB; Nieweg OE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1485-91. PubMed ID: 18324444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Efficacy of ultrasound B-scan compared with physical examination in follow-up of melanoma patients.
Voit C; Mayer T; Kron M; Schoengen A; Sterry W; Weber L; Proebstle TM
Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(12):2409-16. PubMed ID: 11413532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
