These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14685803)

  • 1. Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?
    Nicholls ME; Hughes G; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Feb; 154(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 14685803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Orr CA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of body and environment-centred coordinates on free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Smith A; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Cortex; 2006 Apr; 42(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 16771039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?
    Nicholls ME; Roberts GR
    Cortex; 2002 Apr; 38(2):113-36. PubMed ID: 12056684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Smith A; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15062866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage.
    Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Corben L; Slavin MJ; Nicholls ME; Bradshaw JL
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 14670577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
    Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dorsal stream contributions to perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Schneider O; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Mar; 18(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 22133034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unilateral hemispheric activation does not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Nicholls ME; Bradshaw JL; Mattingley JB
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):219-23. PubMed ID: 11527334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trunk- and head-centred spatial coordinates do not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL; Krins PW
    Brain Cogn; 2003 Nov; 53(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 14607158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower-right and upper-left biases within upper and lower visual fields in a circular array task.
    Szelest I; Elias LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec; 119(3):861-79. PubMed ID: 25375827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16418850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():108-15. PubMed ID: 21362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.