142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14686593)
1. Enhancement of electrolarynx speech using adaptive noise cancelling based on independent component analysis.
Niu HJ; Wan MX; Wang SP; Liu HJ
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 Nov; 41(6):670-8. PubMed ID: 14686593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancement of electrolarynx speech based on auditory masking.
Liu H; Zhao Q; Wan M; Wang S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):865-74. PubMed ID: 16686409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of amplification on the intelligibility of speech produced with an electrolarynx.
Verdolini K; Skinner MW; Patton T; Walker PA
Laryngoscope; 1985 Jun; 95(6):720-6. PubMed ID: 3999906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation.
Liu H; Ng ML
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Sep; 34(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 17239553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancement of electrolaryngeal speech by adaptive filtering.
Espy-Wilson CY; Chari VR; MacAuslan JM; Huang CB; Walsh MJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 9859882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of normal sounding speech for laryngectomy patients through a modified CELP codec.
Sharifzadeh HR; McLoughlin IV; Ahmadi F
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 57(10):2448-58. PubMed ID: 20570761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of spectral subtraction method on enhancement of electrolarynx speech.
Liu H; Zhao Q; Wan M; Wang S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):398-406. PubMed ID: 16875235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intelligibility of stop-plosive and fricative consonants produced by tracheoesophageal speakers in quiet and noise.
Failla S; Doyle PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4075. PubMed ID: 32611144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Voice rehabilitation in laryngectomees: comparison of daily-life performance of 4 types of alaryngeal speech.
Tsai TL; Chang SY; Guo YC; Chu PY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2003 Jun; 66(6):360-3. PubMed ID: 12889505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Harris RW
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Lombard effect associated with Chinese male alaryngeal speech.
Ng ML; Tsang GCK
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30732483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of voice rehabilitation on vocalisation in postlaryngectomy patients: a systematic review.
Xi S
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2010 Dec; 8(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 21091891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and evaluation of on/off control for electrolaryngeal speech via artificial neural network based on visual information of lips.
Wu L; Wan C; Wang S; Wan M
J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):259.e7-259.e16. PubMed ID: 23294707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.
van Sluis KE; van der Molen L; van Son RJJH; Hilgers FJM; Bhairosing PA; van den Brekel MWM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 275(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 29086803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy.
Boyd JH; Varvares M; Fitzmaurice S
Mo Med; 1995 Mar; 92(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 7731448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
