BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14687425)

  • 1. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
    Cayo MR; Talbot TO
    Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
    Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
    Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads.
    Zandbergen PA
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17367533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of residential geocoding in the Agricultural Health Study.
    Jones RR; DellaValle CT; Flory AR; Nordan A; Hoppin JA; Hofmann JN; Chen H; Giglierano J; Lynch CF; Beane Freeman LE; Rushton G; Ward MH
    Int J Health Geogr; 2014 Oct; 13():37. PubMed ID: 25292160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
    Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
    Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
    Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of local street network characteristics on the positional accuracy of automated geocoding for geographic health studies.
    Zimmerman DL; Li J
    Int J Health Geogr; 2010 Feb; 9():10. PubMed ID: 20158886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
    Zandbergen PA; Hart TC; Lenzer KE; Camponovo ME
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22469492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positional error and time-activity patterns in near-highway proximity studies: an exposure misclassification analysis.
    Lane KJ; Kangsen Scammell M; Levy JI; Fuller CH; Parambi R; Zamore W; Mwamburi M; Brugge D
    Environ Health; 2013 Sep; 12(1):75. PubMed ID: 24010639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.
    Strickland MJ; Siffel C; Gardner BR; Berzen AK; Correa A
    Environ Health; 2007 Apr; 6():10. PubMed ID: 17408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
    Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.