These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Three cheers for peers. Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The matter of standards. III. The editorial process. Wilkins AS Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1037-9. PubMed ID: 18937297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement. Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov V Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers. Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact factors: a tool of the sterile audit culture. Tuck A Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6944):14. PubMed ID: 12840730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article]. Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure also leads to worthless publications. de Carvalho LB Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]