These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14688774)

  • 1. Comparison of pullout strength of small-diameter cannulated and solid-core screws.
    Kissel CG; Friedersdorf SC; Foltz DS; Snoeyink T
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2003; 42(6):334-8. PubMed ID: 14688774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pullout strengths of cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws.
    Thompson JD; Benjamin JB; Szivek JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Aug; (341):241-9. PubMed ID: 9269180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
    Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
    Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs: a study using tapped and untapped pilot holes.
    Pfeiffer FM; Abernathie DL; Smith DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E867-70. PubMed ID: 17077722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
    Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 18391719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping.
    Chen LH; Tai CL; Lai PL; Lee DM; Tsai TT; Fu TS; Niu CC; Chen WJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Oct; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 19481845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs.
    McLain RF; Fry MF; Moseley TA; Sharkey NA
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Feb; 8(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 7711371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
    Bong MR; Romero A; Kubiak E; Iesaka K; Heywood CS; Kummer F; Rosen J; Jazrawi L
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Oct; 21(10):1172-6. PubMed ID: 16226643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: biomechanical tests and finite element analyses.
    Hsu CC; Chao CK; Wang JL; Hou SM; Tsai YT; Lin J
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):788-94. PubMed ID: 16022991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation.
    Eck JC; Walker MP; Currier BL; Chen Q; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 17912127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of screw pullout strength: a function of screw orientation in subtalar joint arthrodesis.
    McGlamry MC; Robitaille MF
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2004; 43(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 15480401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cannulated screw with solid core insert: stronger than cannulated screws.
    Dundon JM; Gould GC; Herbenick MA; Hamilton JA
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Sep; 43(9):E191-3. PubMed ID: 25251531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical performance of cylindrical and dual core pedicle screws in calf and human vertebrae.
    Lill CA; Schneider E; Goldhahn J; Haslemann A; Zeifang F
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Dec; 126(10):686-94. PubMed ID: 16865403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws.
    Cyr SJ; Currier BL; Eck JC; Foy A; Chen Q; Larson DR; Yaszemski MJ; An KN
    Spine J; 2008; 8(4):661-5. PubMed ID: 17526435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of the insertion technique on the pullout force of pedicle screws: an experimental study.
    Chatzistergos PE; Sapkas G; Kourkoulis SK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):E332-7. PubMed ID: 20150834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.