273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14689614)
1. Cortical evoked response audiometry thresholds and neuroleptic, sedative, hypnotic drugs.
Dejonckere PH; Lebacq J; Coryn C
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 14689614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between middle latency responses and late auditory evoked potentials for approximating frequency-specific hearing levels in medicolegal patients with occupational hearing loss.
Dejonckere PH; Coryn CP
Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 14689639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Agreement between auditory threshold calculated from cortical evoked response audiometry and tone audiometry in occupational hearing loss].
Janisch R; Jerábek J
Cesk Otolaryngol; 1990 Aug; 39(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 2289246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment].
Xia YJ; Hao FT; Wang CY; Li JL; Fu X
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Relations between pure-tone audiometry and cortical evoked auditory potentials].
Albera R; Canale G; Magnano M; Lacilla M; Morra B; Rugiu MG; Cortesina G
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1991; 11(6):551-62. PubMed ID: 1819182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emission in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss.
Kowalska S; Sułkowski W
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1997; 10(4):441-59. PubMed ID: 9575669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of cortical evoked response audiometry in the assessment of noise-induced hearing loss.
Hone SW; Norman G; Keogh I; Kelly V
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Feb; 128(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 12601323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss.
van der Drift JF; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
Audiology; 1987; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise--induced hearing loss].
Wang Y; Yang B; Li Y; Hou L; Hu Y; Han Y
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 12768684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
Dobie RA
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exaggerated hearing loss in compensation claimants.
Alberti PW; Hyde ML; Riko K
J Otolaryngol; 1987 Dec; 16(6):362-6. PubMed ID: 2961891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.
Attias J; Karawani H; Shemesh R; Nageris B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 24509531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of pseudohypacusis: a prospective, randomized study of the use of otoacoustic emissions.
Balatsouras DG; Kaberos A; Korres S; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E; Economou C
Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):518-827. PubMed ID: 14663351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed to occupational noise.
Korres GS; Balatsouras DG; Tzagaroulakis A; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E
B-ENT; 2008; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 18949961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of noise induced hearing loss.
Fabiani M; Mattioni A; Saponara M; Cordier A
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1998; 48():147-53. PubMed ID: 9505307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory-evoked potentials in general anesthesia monitoring: baseline study of availability in relation to hearing function in awake status.
De Siena L; Pallavicino F; Lacilla M; Canale A; Longobardo A; Pecorari G; Albera R
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Jul; 49(6):774-7. PubMed ID: 15954958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
