98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14690331)
1. Absorbed dose determination with plane-parallel chambers.
Austerlitz C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 14690331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental determination of beam quality factors, kQ, for two types of Farmer chamber in a 10 MV photon and a 175 MeV proton beam.
Medin J; Ross CK; Klassen NV; Palmans H; Grusell E; Grindborg JE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 16510959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microionization chamber for reference dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications on OAR dosimetric errors.
Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Leal A; Roselló JV; Lagares JI; Arráns R; Hartmann GH
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):959-70. PubMed ID: 15798268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical calibration dosimetry in JSMP-01: measurements using plane-parallel ion chambers.].
Araki F; Kumagai K; Yoshiura T; Oura H; Tachibana M; Moribe N; Tajima H; Yoshida A; Kido T
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):114-23. PubMed ID: 16373987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electron beam quality k(Q,Q0) factors for various ionization chambers: a Monte Carlo investigation with PENELOPE.
Erazo F; Brualla L; Lallena AM
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6673-91. PubMed ID: 25325343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetry study comparing NCS report-2 versus IAEA report TRS-398 for high energy photon beams.
Attalla EM; Khaled NE; Abou-Elenein HS; Elsayed AA
Gulf J Oncolog; 2008 Jan; (3):25-31. PubMed ID: 20084794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proton beam monitor chamber calibration.
Gomà C; Lorentini S; Meer D; Safai S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(17):4961-71. PubMed ID: 25109620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Uncertainty of cross calibration-applied beam quality conversion factor for the Japan Society of Medical Physics 12].
Kinoshita N; Kita A; Takemura A; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Sep; 70(9):877-82. PubMed ID: 25242596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct determination of k
Osinga-Blättermann JM; Brons S; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Krauss A
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2033-2054. PubMed ID: 28212111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linear accelerator photon outputs from the IAEA TRS-398 and TRS-277 codes of practice.
Fourie OL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Mar; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18488961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo correction factors for a Farmer 0.6 cm3 ion chamber dose measurement in the build-up region of the 6 MV clinical beam.
Pena J; Sánchez-Doblado F; Capote R; Terrón JA; Gómez F
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1523-32. PubMed ID: 16510960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Absorbed dose to water determination with ionization chamber dosimetry and calorimetry in restricted neutron, photon, proton and heavy-ion radiation fields.
Brede HJ; Greif KD; Hecker O; Heeg P; Heese J; Jones DT; Kluge H; Schardt D
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3667-82. PubMed ID: 16861773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
