227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14690850)
1. Brief communication: the role of category structure in determining the effects of stimulus preexposure on categorization accuracy.
Wills AJ; Suret M; McLaren IP
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 14690850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Information-integration category learning in patients with striatal dysfunction.
Filoteo JV; Maddox WT; Salmon DP; Song DD
Neuropsychology; 2005 Mar; 19(2):212-22. PubMed ID: 15769205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
Benard J; Stach S; Giurfa M
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 16909238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The missing whole in perceptual models of perirhinal cortex.
Cate AD; Köhler S
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):396-7. PubMed ID: 16899399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Feature-based versus exemplar-based strategies in preschoolers' category learning.
Krascum RM; Andrews S
J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 8366324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks.
Pothos EM; Perlman A; Bailey TM; Kurtz K; Edwards DJ; Hines P; McDonnell JV
Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 21733497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of age on rule-based category learning.
Racine CA; Barch DM; Braver TS; Noelle DC
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):411-34. PubMed ID: 16887781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning.
Lavis Y; Mitchell C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2083-101. PubMed ID: 17095489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
Redhead ES
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociation between striatal regions while learning to categorize via feedback and via observation.
Cincotta CM; Seger CA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):249-65. PubMed ID: 17280514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can patients with Alzheimer's disease learn a category implicitly?
Bozoki A; Grossman M; Smith EE
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16229868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Formation of category representations in superior temporal sulcus.
van der Linden M; van Turennout M; Indefrey P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1270-82. PubMed ID: 19445608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Processing of visual hierarchical stimuli by fish (Xenotoca eiseni).
Truppa V; Sovrano VA; Spinozzi G; Bisazza A
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 19800926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential outcomes aid the formation of categorical relationships between stimuli.
Easton A; Child S; Lopez-Crespo G
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 222(1):270-3. PubMed ID: 21440010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental changes in the effect of dimensional salience on the discriminability of object relations.
Thompson LA; Markson L
J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 9679077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of abstract letter representations for reading: evidence for the role of context.
Polk TA; Lacey HP; Nelson JK; Demiralp E; Newman LI; Krauss DA; Raheja A; Farah MJ
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):70-90. PubMed ID: 19340615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exemplar similarity and rule application.
Hahn U; Prat-Sala M; Pothos EM; Brumby DP
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19815187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
