These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14691952)

  • 1. The impacts of errors in individual genotyping and DNA pooling on association studies.
    Zou G; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact and quantification of the sources of error in DNA pooling designs.
    Jawaid A; Sham P
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18945289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of DNA pooling to estimate haplotype frequencies.
    Wang S; Kidd KK; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 12508258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Most pooling variation in array-based DNA pooling is attributable to array error rather than pool construction error.
    Macgregor S
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 Apr; 15(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 17264871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of disease causing loci using an array-based genotyping approach on pooled DNA.
    Craig DW; Huentelman MJ; Hu-Lince D; Zismann VL; Kruer MC; Lee AM; Puffenberger EG; Pearson JM; Stephan DA
    BMC Genomics; 2005 Sep; 6():138. PubMed ID: 16197552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate determination of microsatellite allele frequencies in pooled DNA samples.
    Schnack HG; Bakker SC; van 't Slot R; Groot BM; Sinke RJ; Kahn RS; Pearson PL
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 12(11):925-34. PubMed ID: 15305176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiency of DNA pooling to estimate joint allele frequencies and measure linkage disequilibrium.
    Pfeiffer RM; Rutter JL; Gail MH; Struewing J; Gastwirth JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 11754476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian method for gene detection and mapping, using a case and control design and DNA pooling.
    Johnson T
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):546-65. PubMed ID: 16984977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating haplotype-disease associations with pooled genotype data.
    Zeng D; Lin DY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jan; 28(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 15558554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNPs/pools: a methodology for the identification of relevant SNPs in breast cancer epidemiology.
    Silva SN; Guerreiro D; Gomes M; Azevedo AP; Bezerra De Castro G; Rueff J; Gaspar JF
    Oncol Rep; 2012 Feb; 27(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 22024983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power of direct vs. indirect haplotyping in association studies.
    Thomas S; Porteous D; Visscher PM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 14748011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A DNA pooling strategy for family-based association studies.
    Lee WC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Apr; 14(4):958-62. PubMed ID: 15824170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal selection strategies for QTL mapping using pooled DNA samples.
    Jawaid A; Bader JS; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Sham P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 10(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 11938443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PoooL: an efficient method for estimating haplotype frequencies from large DNA pools.
    Zhang H; Yang HC; Yang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(17):1942-8. PubMed ID: 18573795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel linkage mapping approach using DNA pooling in human and animal genetics. I. Detection of complex disease loci.
    Pareek CS; Pareek RS; Walawski K
    J Appl Genet; 2002; 43(2):175-92. PubMed ID: 12080174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.