270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14692005)
21. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
Liu HY; Weng LJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multilevel IRT using dichotomous and polytomous response data.
Fox JP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):145-72. PubMed ID: 15969844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Equivalence versus classical statistical tests in water quality assessments.
Ngatia M; Gonzalez D; San Julian S; Conner A
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):172-7. PubMed ID: 20082011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Taxometrics, polytomous constructs, and the comparison curve fit index: a Monte Carlo analysis.
Walters GD; McGrath RE; Knight RA
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 20230161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. One-sided nonparametric tests for ordinal data.
Neuhäuser M
Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):510-4. PubMed ID: 16383087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
Becker G
Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Viechtbauer W
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.
Raudenbush SW; Xiao-Feng L
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 11778679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):173-81. PubMed ID: 15171807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Testing equivalence with repeated measures: tests of the difference model of two-alternative forced-choice performance.
García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):1023-49. PubMed ID: 22059346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
Raykov T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
Charter RA
J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bioequivalence of two commercial preparations of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole: a randomized, single-dose, single-blind, crossover trial.
Alonso Campero R; Bernardo Escudero R; Del Cisne Valle Alvarez D; González de la Parra M; Namur Montalvo S; Burke Fraga V; Silva Hernandez R; De Lago Acosta A
Clin Ther; 2007 Feb; 29(2):326-33. PubMed ID: 17472824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Statistical method for the determination of equivalence of automated test procedures.
Lung KR; Gorko MA; Llewelyn J; Wiggins N
J Autom Methods Manag Chem; 2003; 25(6):123-7. PubMed ID: 18924621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
Tryon WW
Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
Levy R; Svetina D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reporting subscores for institutions.
Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
