These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. Koczarski MJ Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Esthetic inlays and onlays. Jackson RD Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars. Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Ceramic inlays and onlays]. van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior composite resin inlays and onlays: a comparison of available systems. Porter KH Tex Dent J; 1990 May; 107(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 2375001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aesthetic inlays and onlays: a clinical technique update. Jackson RD Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 5(3):18-27; quiz 27. PubMed ID: 8593358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite. de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--part II. Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 17(7):449-54; quiz 456. PubMed ID: 18655333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct inlay restorations: utilization of sonic preparation technology in conjunction with ceramic inserts. Koczarski MJ; Mitchell AL Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):555-60; quiz 561, 565. PubMed ID: 18038722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A nonmechanical etiology: The adhesive design concept. Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; James A Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 18(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 16933538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review. Terry DA; Touati B Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]