These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14692363)

  • 41. Measurement issues.
    Duli LS
    Orthop Nurs; 1989; 8(4):56-7, 68. PubMed ID: 2762024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are we missing anything? Pursuing research on attrition.
    Marcellus L
    Can J Nurs Res; 2004 Sep; 36(3):82-98. PubMed ID: 15551664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research.
    Porter S
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 17824942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Medication adherence self-report instruments: implications for practice and research.
    Rolley JX; Davidson PM; Dennison CR; Ong A; Everett B; Salamonson Y
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 18953213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Introduction to instrument development: scaling methods.
    Summers S
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1993 Feb; 8(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 8478809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO.
    Müller-Staub M; Lunney M; Odenbreit M; Needham I; Lavin MA; van Achterberg T
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1027-37. PubMed ID: 19220614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.
    Murphy SA; Johnson LC
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers.
    Cicchetti D; Bronen R; Spencer S; Haut S; Berg A; Oliver P; Tyrer P
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Aug; 194(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 16909062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Why are reliability and validity important to neuroscience nurses?
    Buelow JM; Hinkle JL
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2008 Dec; 40(6):369-70, 372. PubMed ID: 19170305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What's in your toolbox? Considerations when selecting and evaluating instruments in clinical research.
    Hedges C
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2008; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers.
    Lee P
    Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 18-24; 102(29):30-2. PubMed ID: 16895246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools.
    Alison T; Shields L
    Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Nov; 17(9):43. PubMed ID: 16315818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In response to Porter S. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: reasserting realism in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60 (1), 79-86.
    Rolfe G
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Oct; 60(1):108-9. PubMed ID: 17824944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. So you want to do research? 5: Questionnaire design.
    Meadows KA
    Br J Community Nurs; 2003 Dec; 8(12):562-70. PubMed ID: 14688664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Factors to weigh when considering electronic data collection.
    Courtney KL; Craven CK
    Can J Nurs Res; 2005 Sep; 37(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 16268094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Three new observational scales for use in Dutch nursing homes: scales from the Resident Assessment Instrument for Activities of Daily Living, cognition and depression].
    Gerritsen D; Ooms M; Steverink N; Frijters D; Bezemer D; Ribbe M
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2004 Apr; 35(2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15230054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Critical evaluation of the use of research tools in evaluating quality of life for people with schizophrenia.
    Hewitt J
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2007 Feb; 16(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 17229269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Asessment and measurement of psychosocial variables: a challenge for nursing research and attention].
    Mota DD; Pimenta CA
    Rev Gaucha Enferm; 2007 Sep; 28(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 18183691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A guide to evaluating hypotheses and definitions of variables.
    Haughey BP
    Crit Care Nurse; 1992 Dec; 12(8):98-103. PubMed ID: 1288958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The purpose and use of questionnaires in research.
    Jack B; Clarke AM
    Prof Nurse; 1998 Dec; 14(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 10095687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.