BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14692996)

  • 1. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.
    Kok A; Ramautar JR; De Ruiter MB; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Jan; 41(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 14692996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: the N2/P3 complex further validated.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):234-52. PubMed ID: 15518938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological activity underlying inhibitory control processes in normal adults.
    Schmajuk M; Liotti M; Busse L; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(3):384-95. PubMed ID: 16095637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stop-signal modality on the N2/P3 complex elicited in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ramautar JR; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 16157441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural correlates of successful and partial inhibitions in children: an ERP study.
    Cragg L; Fox A; Nation K; Reid C; Anderson M
    Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Nov; 51(7):533-43. PubMed ID: 19685486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pure electrophysiology of stopping.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Hoeksma MR; Talsma D; Verbaten MN
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Feb; 55(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15649550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
    Righi S; Mecacci L; Viggiano MP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 19695828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Additive factors analysis of inhibitory processing in the stop-signal paradigm.
    van den Wildenberg WP; van der Molen MW
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):253-66. PubMed ID: 15518939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Bekker EM; Overtoom CC; Kooij JJ; Buitelaar JK; Verbaten MN; Kenemans JL
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 62(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 16203958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.
    Senderecka M; Grabowska A; Szewczyk J; Gerc K; Chmylak R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 21641941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18096294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults: stop-signal performance and event-related potentials.
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2007 Mar; 31(2):443-54. PubMed ID: 17175083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
    Kaiser S; Weiss O; Hill H; Markela-Lerenc J; Kiefer M; Weisbrod M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition.
    Ramautar JR; Slagter HA; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 16616048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.