These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14693260)

  • 1. Publication of negative research findings: pros and cons.
    Jerrells TR
    Alcohol; 2003 Nov; 31(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 14693260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Vision for Preparing the Next Generation of Reviewers for the Scholarly Scientific Publication Process.
    Habal MB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):275-6. PubMed ID: 26963295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The last bastion of collegiality: the peer-review process in the era of open access.
    el-Azhary RA
    Int J Dermatol; 2016 Mar; 55(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 26864493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Not Available].
    Strauss A
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2016 Oct; 220(5):189-190. PubMed ID: 27764884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reflections on pediatric research.
    Zipursky A
    Pediatr Res; 2003 Dec; 54(6):790. PubMed ID: 14605239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenges for editors.
    Wagner BM
    Toxicol Pathol; 1997; 25(4):410-1. PubMed ID: 9280128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rewarding reviewers, tracking our authors and selective electronic publication.
    Harris JP
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):217-218. PubMed ID: 28371034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation as the New Distribution.
    Mak HC
    Cell Syst; 2017 May; 4(5):471. PubMed ID: 28544875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Between the paper mills and the World Wide Web.
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2015 Jan; 135(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 25589098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does it take too long to publish research?
    Powell K
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7589):148-51. PubMed ID: 26863966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too much of a good thing….
    Julian T
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Headache online.
    Schwedt TJ; Roberts J
    Headache; 2010 May; 50(5):736-7. PubMed ID: 20546319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experts plan to reclaim the web for pop science.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):516-7. PubMed ID: 16452941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Report of the editors--2015.
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 27059160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Traditional publications: an endangered species?
    Marcus A
    Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Feb; 58(2 Suppl):S149-52. PubMed ID: 18240269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rumors of the Demise of Peer Review are Premature.
    Kravitz RL; Feldman MD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1717-21. PubMed ID: 26407592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accepting the torch.
    Mantzoros CS
    Metabolism; 2010 Oct; 59(10):1394-5. PubMed ID: 20855035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editorial.
    Weisse T
    Eur J Protistol; 2015 Apr; 51(2):A1-2. PubMed ID: 26008765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The journal's development since the introduction of online manuscript submission and the double blinded peer review of manuscripts].
    Göbel U; Gortner L
    Klin Padiatr; 2010 Jul; 222(4):231-3. PubMed ID: 20665364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.