These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14693270)
1. Multivariate models to predict clinically important outcomes at prostatectomy for patients with organ-confined disease and needle biopsy Gleason scores of 6 or less. DiMarco DS; Blute ML; Zincke H; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Sebo TJ Urol Oncol; 2003; 21(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 14693270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting prostate carcinoma volume and stage at radical prostatectomy by assessing needle biopsy specimens for percent surface area and cores positive for carcinoma, perineural invasion, Gleason score, DNA ploidy and proliferation, and preoperative serum prostate specific antigen: a report of 454 cases. Sebo TJ; Cheville JC; Riehle DL; Lohse CM; Pankratz VS; Myers RP; Blute ML; Zincke H Cancer; 2001 Jun; 91(11):2196-204. PubMed ID: 11391602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy. Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Correlation of the anatomo-pathological staging of radical prostatectomy specimens with the amount of cancer in the preoperative sextant biopsy]. Ojea Calvo A; Núñez López A; Domínguez Freire F; Alonso Rodrigo A; Rodríguez Iglesias B; Benavente Delgado J; Barros Rodríguez JM; Gómez-González MC; González Piñeiro A; Otero García M; Nogueira March JL Actas Urol Esp; 2003 Jun; 27(6):428-37. PubMed ID: 12918149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Sengupta S; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Zincke H; Myers RP; Riehle DL; Pankratz VS; Blute ML; Sebo TJ Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 16844452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of tumour volume and pathological stage in radical prostatectomy specimens is not improved by taking more prostate needle-biopsy cores. Grossklaus DJ; Coffey CS; Shappell SB; Jack GS; Cookson MS BJU Int; 2001 Nov; 88(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 11890243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Important preoperative prognostic factors for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement in cases with radical retropubic prostatectomy. Ozgür A; Onol FF; Türkeri LN Int Urol Nephrol; 2004; 36(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 15783108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Montanari E; Del Nero A; Gazzano G; Mangiarotti B; Bernardini P; Longo F; Cordima G; Itri E Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Mar; 81(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19499751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Carmichael M; Brendler CB JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 7506797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2136-41. PubMed ID: 12771735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis. Egan AJ; Bostwick DG Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of minute (0.5 MM or less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specific antigen density. Allan RW; Sanderson H; Epstein JI J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):370-2. PubMed ID: 12853777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy for impalpable prostate cancer: the Johns Hopkins experience with tumors found on transurethral resection (stages T1A and T1B) and on needle biopsy (stage T1C). Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Brendler CB J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1721-9. PubMed ID: 7523719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen. San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings. Epstein JI; Chan DW; Sokoll LJ; Walsh PC; Cox JL; Rittenhouse H; Wolfert R; Carter HB J Urol; 1998 Dec; 160(6 Pt 2):2407-11. PubMed ID: 9817393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative parameters to predict tumor volume in Japanese patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer. Furuya Y; Fuse H; Nagakawa O; Masai M Int J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 7(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12018107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer. Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percent of cancer in the biopsy set predicts pathological findings after prostatectomy. Grossklaus DJ; Coffey CS; Shappell SB; Jack GS; Chang SS; Cookson MS J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2032-5; discussion 2036. PubMed ID: 11956432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]