These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14693761)

  • 1. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research.
    Pesudovs K; Hazel CA; Doran RM; Elliott DB
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 88(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 14693761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract.
    Hong YT; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 20362843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.
    Hertenstein H; Bach M; Gross NJ; Beisse F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 25921390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.
    Bradley A; Hook J; Haeseker J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jul; 11(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 1766685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishment of a normative database and evaluation of the test-retest repeatability of the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test.
    Gupta L; Waisbourd M; Sanvicente CT; Hsieh M; Wizov SS; Spaeth EE; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 63(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 30415314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contrast sensitivity function in myopic LASIK].
    Yan Z; Hu J; Gu X; Sun M; Yang L
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 38(11):677-9. PubMed ID: 12487899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of LASIK refractive procedures on visual functions in patients with myopia].
    Hejcmanová M; Horácková M
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 May; 62(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 16758761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular interaction in post-LASIK subjects with unsatisfactory outcome.
    Subramaniam SV
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Dec; 34(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 19958121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.
    Townley D; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20070279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age differences in Vistech near contrast sensitivity.
    Scialfa CT; Tyrrell RA; Garvey PM; Deering LM; Leibowitz HW; Goebel CC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Dec; 65(12):951-6. PubMed ID: 3066222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vistech VCTS 6500 charts--within- and between-session reliability.
    Reeves BC; Wood JM; Hill AR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Sep; 68(9):728-37. PubMed ID: 1745500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of visual function in myopia over -6.0 dpt after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J; Feuermannová A; Rozsíval P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2001 Sep; 57(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 11764685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes.
    Cobo-Soriano R; Calvo MA; Beltrán J; Llovet FL; Baviera J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1357-65. PubMed ID: 16105607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the Vistech contrast sensitivity test for repeated-measures applications.
    Kennedy RS; Dunlap WP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Apr; 67(4):248-51. PubMed ID: 2342786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Four-year visual, refractive, and contrast sensitivity outcomes after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using an advanced excimer laser platform.
    Shaheen MS; Massoud TH; Ezzeldin H; Khalifa MA
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):816-22. PubMed ID: 24168789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study.
    Padmanabhan P; Mrochen M; Basuthkar S; Viswanathan D; Joseph R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 18299062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
    Alió JL; Montés-Mico R
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cataract surgery on contrast sensitivity and glare in patients with 20/50 or better Snellen acuity.
    Pfoff DS; Werner JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1994 Nov; 20(6):620-5. PubMed ID: 7837072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratectomy on patients' reading performance.
    Richter-Mueksch S; Kaminski S; Kuchar A; Stifter E; Velikay-Parel M; Radner W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1544-8. PubMed ID: 16129289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.