199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14693831)
1. The impact of involvement of biomedical scientists in specimen dissection and selection of blocks for histopathology: a study of time benefits and specimen handling quality in Ayrshire and Arran area laboratory.
Duthie FR; Nairn ER; Milne AW; McTaggart V; Topping D
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jan; 57(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 14693831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current experience and attitudes to biomedical scientist cut-up: results of an online survey of UK consultant histopathologists.
Simmons EJ; Sanders DS; Carr RA
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):363-6. PubMed ID: 21345873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhanced biomedical scientist cut-up role in colonic cancer reporting.
Sanders SA; Smith A; Carr RA; Roberts S; Gurusamy S; Simmons E
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 22412051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Activity-based differentiation of pathologists' workload in surgical pathology.
Meijer GA; Oudejans JJ; Koevoets JJ; Meijer CJ
Virchows Arch; 2009 Jun; 454(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 19399515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An intervention study to reduce the loss of pathology specimens.
Shalom A; Westreich M; Sandbank S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Jul; 15(7):356-8. PubMed ID: 23943980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of specimen fixation in a surgical pathology service.
Start RD; Cross SS; Smith JH
J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 45(6):546-7. PubMed ID: 1306049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Warwick system of prospective workload allocation in cellular pathology--an aid to subspecialisation: a comparison with the Royal College of Pathologists' system.
Carr RA; Sanders DS; Stores OP; Smew FA; Parkes ME; Ross-Gilbertson V; Chachlani N; Simon J
J Clin Pathol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):835-9. PubMed ID: 16524963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 8629896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of turnaround times as a component of quality assurance in surgical pathology.
Ribé A; Ribalta T; Lledó R; Torras G; Asenjo MA; Cardesa A
Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun; 10(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 9661063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid on-site assessment of specimens by biomedical scientists improves the quality of head and neck fine needle aspiration cytology.
Breeze J; Poller DN; Gibson D; Tilley EA; Cooke L; Soar E; Repanos C
Cytopathology; 2014 Oct; 25(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 24138590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gross Dissection Time Values of Pathologists' Assistants Using Standardized Metrics.
Volel V; Kothari T; Groppi D; Alexis C; Ragnauth M; Qureshi R; Entin A; Alexander A; Yaskiv O; Crawford JM; Kohn N; Bhuiya T
Am J Clin Pathol; 2019 May; 151(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 30880344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Approaches to routine handling of basal cell carcinoma re-excision specimens: a survey of Australian histopathologists.
Warren LR; Karoo R; Caplash Y; Otto S
Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22531342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a "pneumatic" tube in anatomic pathology.
Brooks JJ; Hamilton B; LiVolsi VA; Pietra GG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Nov; 86(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 3776921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time Required for Gross Examination of Routine Second and Third Trimester Singleton Placentas by Pathologists' Assistants.
Horn C; Engel N; Drouin D; Haley J; Holder C; Hung L; Royall L; McInnis P; de Koning L; Chan ES
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2023; 26(5):466-471. PubMed ID: 37672728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new guideline from the College of American Pathologists to improve the adequacy of thoracic small specimens for ancillary studies.
Roy-Chowdhuri S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Oct; 128(10):690-692. PubMed ID: 32520433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.
Arnold MA; Chenever E; Baker PB; Boué DR; Fung B; Hammond S; Hendrickson BW; Kahwash SB; Pierson CR; Prasad V; Nicol KK; Barr T
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 25387255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Handling and reporting of biopsy and surgical specimens of testicular cancer.
Winstanley AM; Mikuz G; Debruyne F; Schulman CC; Parkinson MC;
Eur Urol; 2004 May; 45(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 15082197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
