108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14694831)
1. Clinical validity of the interactive and low-dose three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging system, tuned-aperture computed tomography.
Hayakawa Y; Yamamoto K; Kousuge Y; Kobayashi N; Wakoh M; Sekiguchi H; Yakushiji M; Farman AG
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2003 Aug; 44(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 14694831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging.
Webber RL; Horton RA; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 9446991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of tuned-aperture computed tomography versus conventional dentoalveolar imaging in assessment of impacted teeth.
Yamamoto K; Hayakawa Y; Kousuge Y; Wakoh M; Sekiguchi H; Yakushiji M; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jan; 95(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 12539036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities.
Webber RL; Messura JK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 10468470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT).
Nair MK
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2003; (159):1-93. PubMed ID: 12856440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography.
Walker L; Enciso R; Mah J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 16214621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of tuned aperture computed tomography in the diagnosis of radicular fractures in non-restored maxillary anterior teeth--an in vitro study.
Nair MK; Nair UP; Gröndahl HG; Webber RL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Sep; 31(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 12203128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of digital volume tomography in the imaging of impacted teeth.
Chaushu S; Chaushu G; Becker A
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 15615130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Different diagnostic tools for the localization of impacted maxillary canines: clinical considerations.
Maverna R; Gracco A
Prog Orthod; 2007; 8(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 17364031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using panoramic radiography.
Nagpal A; Pai KM; Setty S; Sharma G
J Oral Sci; 2009 Mar; 51(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 19325198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning.
Ganz SD
Dent Implantol Update; 2005 Dec; 16(12):89-95. PubMed ID: 16422471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Impacted teeth in the maxilla: usefulness of 3D Dental-CT for preoperative evaluation.
Sawamura T; Minowa K; Nakamura M
Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 12927666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
