These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1469498)

  • 1. An in vitro study of the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the radiographic images of the amelocemental junction and simulated alveolar crest.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Addy M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Nov; 19(6):629-37. PubMed ID: 1469498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiographic amelocemental junction and alveolar crest: effect of X-ray beam angulation.
    Jenkins SM; Dummer PM; Newcombe RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Sep; 22(9):679-84. PubMed ID: 7490667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of projection angles upon position of cementoenamel junction on radiographs.
    Sewerin I; Andersen V; Stoltze K
    Scand J Dent Res; 1987 Feb; 95(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 3470902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of x-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic alveolar crest level measurement.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Christersson L; Genco RJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 2524574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of x-ray projection angulation for successful radix entomolaris diagnosis in mandibular first molars in vitro.
    Wang Q; Yu G; Zhou XD; Peters OA; Zheng QH; Huang DM
    J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1063-8. PubMed ID: 21763895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal bone level in the normal primary dentition.
    Sjödin B; Matsson L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 19(9 Pt 1):672-8. PubMed ID: 1430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of X-ray beam vertical angulation on radiographic assessment of alveolar crest level.
    Zulqarnain BJ; Almas K
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 10530200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal.
    Morant RD; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 11174606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and panoramic assessment of marginal bone loss. A cadaver study.
    Soikkonen K; Wolf J; Tenkanen M
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1990; 86(3-4):137-41. PubMed ID: 2094846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overhanging amalgam restorations in young adults attending a periodontal department.
    Kells BE; Linden GJ
    J Dent; 1992 Apr; 20(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 1564185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A radiographic study of interproximal alveolar bone crest between the primary molars in children.
    Bimstein E; Soskolne AW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(5):348-50. PubMed ID: 3170873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term effect of thin interdental alveolar bone on periodontal health after orthodontic treatment.
    Artun J; Osterberg SK; Kokich VG
    J Periodontol; 1986 Jun; 57(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 3459857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of automated registration algorithms for subtraction radiography.
    Ettinger GJ; Gordon GG; Goodson JM; Socransky SS; Williams R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Sep; 21(8):540-3. PubMed ID: 7989617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang HM; Shen JW; Yu MF; Chen XY; Jiang QH; He FM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1123-9. PubMed ID: 25216138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray beam angulation can compromise 2-dimensional diagnosis of interradicular space for mini-implants.
    Barros SE; Abella M; Janson G; Chiqueto K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 31677667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Accuracy of determining the Distance between Alveolar Crest and Cementoenamel Junction in Digital Radiography with Scanora and DentalEye Software Programs.
    Mehdizadeh M; Maarefat N; Bagherieh S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):815-819. PubMed ID: 27794151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs.
    van der Stelt PF; Ruttiman UE; Webber RL; Heemstra P
    Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 2766319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crestal bone loss from serial intraoral radiographs.
    Hausmann E; Allen K; Carpio L; Christersson LA; Clerehugh V
    J Periodontol; 1992 Aug; 63(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 1507045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of repeat bitewing radiographs determined by measurement of the distance between the amelocemental junction and the alveolar crest: an ex vivo study using human skulls.
    Bishop K; Dummer PM; Kingdon A; Newcombe RG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 8617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.